Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> <br /> 6 <br /> <br /> 7 <br /> <br /> 8 <br /> <br /> 9 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />99 <br /> <br />officer standing at that intersection with a <br />handheld radar gun and documenting it. <br /> <br /> LARRY BAKKEN: If the council wants <br />to do monitoring, they can do that in a <br />fashion that would not -- <br /> <br /> RESIDENT: <br /> <br />it to be obvious. <br /> <br /> LARRY BAKKEN: <br />what you're saying. <br /> <br /> RESIDENT: <br /> <br />I don't -- we don't want <br /> <br />Right. No. I hear <br /> <br />My second comment is a <br /> <br />question about the wetlands, where it's going <br />through to the west, because I live near <br />there. We were told it wasn't going to go <br />through. I don't know the name of the person <br />that told us, but we were told, "Well, if it <br />goes through there will be a suspension bridge <br />so they do not destroy the wetlands." And <br />then, "Oh, no, it's not going in because a <br />suspension bridge would be over a million <br />dollars and we cannot afford that." Six <br />months later, they're ripping up the wetlands. <br />All they did was remove it layer by layer, but <br />the bridge through, not a professional job in <br />our opinion, and then they -- and you can talk <br />to anybody on that side. That wetland was <br /> <br />ADAMS COURT REPORTING (612) 421-2486 <br /> <br /> <br />