My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/01/11 Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2010's
>
2011
>
02/01/11 Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 1:49:50 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 9:17:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority - Special
Document Date
02/01/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Jeffrey and Commissioner Ramsey stated they "loved it ". <br />Mr. Lazan continued with the north residential district. There are three components — a triangle <br />parcel that was a townhome site but the market doesn't really call for that now. It seems that <br />$200,000 single - family homes are more what the market calls for. The horseshoe component — <br />the discussion should be are we leaving it there forever. <br />Commissioner Elvig stated that with regard to the triangle — we will have some fill issues there — <br />he asked about the drainage and Mr. Lazan explained the drainage. <br />Commissioner Ramsey asked how long is that product going to be on the market (horseshoe) — <br />Mr. Lazan responded five to seven years. <br />Commissioner Ramsey suggested rough grading it, fencing it and making it a dog park. <br />Mr. Lazan stated that his thought is you can put a lot of units here but he recommended we grade <br />it and seed it so it looks better. The north commons — there are a number of comments and <br />questions, etc. on this At the request of a handful of people, we looked at putting lots on two <br />sides of this park. We drove the area and got rid of all the lots on one side. He talked about a <br />sliding hill, trees, tot lots, etc. for the park. He added that we end up with eight lots. If someone <br />is interested, it may be six lots instead. <br />Commissioner Tossey asked what that builder was willing to pay per lot. <br />Mr. Lazan stated about $15,000 a lot, however, he thought we could push $20,000 — that's low <br />but not too low (triangle). He added he would rather take $15,000 and have them put $5,000 <br />back into the product. <br />Commissioner Tossey cautioned to not sell ourselves short. <br />Commissioner McGlone stated that people in Ramsey drive pick -up trucks and expeditions, etc., <br />so we need to make sure the driveways are long enough and the garages are back far enough. <br />Commissioner Backous stated there are a lot of empty lots. He liked the idea of going a little <br />lower and putting more into the product. <br />Mr. Lazan stated that's the north residential area. Are we willing to sell lots in a configuration <br />like this and willing to give the process to the park. Are we on track? <br />Chairperson Jeffrey stated he likes it, but because we are changing zoning, does this have to go <br />to a public hearing and planning? <br />Deputy City Administrator Nelson replied yes. She added that with regard to the park issue, we <br />have talked about taking this to the park board. We need to work through that. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / February 1, 2011 <br />Page 4 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.