My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/13/1999
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1999
>
Agenda - Council - 07/13/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 3:43:20 PM
Creation date
9/12/2003 9:27:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/13/1999
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1'717 <br /> <br />corridor, tn his presentation he noted signs that appeared to be larger than 100 square feet and <br />taller than 35 feet. The visual presentation also identified a clutter problem in the corridor due to <br />trees, signs and power lines, that would obscure visibility of the Burger King sign as you travel <br />west on Highway # 10. <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik explained that subsequent to the Planning Comm/ssion meeting, <br />Staff did meet with the Applicant to review some of the permit issued for other signs in the <br />Highway #10 corridor. The records indicated the following square footages on freestanding <br />signs: Holiday R.V. - i00; Holiday Stationstore - 91 (however, they received a conditional use <br />permit in 1998 for an additional 31 square feet to accommodate a reader board but when they <br />revamped the signage in 1994, they decreased the freestanding sign to 91 square feet); <br />Equipment- 100; Amoco -received a conditional use permit for 125 to accommodate a reader <br />board; Diamonds Sports Bar - 100; Comfort Suites - 93; Anoka-Ramsey Sports Center - <br />received a conditional use permit for 300. This doesn't mean that there aren't some lawful, and <br />most likely unlawful, non-conforming signs still in use along the corridor. <br />development along the highway has become more sophisticated and there is a corresponding <br />trend in compliance with the sign regulations; conditional use permits for overages have been <br />minimal in recent years. <br /> <br />Greg Clone, Dolphin Realty, stated that they just received notification that Burger King was <br />changing ali of the signs with a new logo which will be ready for production by August 15th. Mr. <br />Clone explained that the new sign is 113 square feet instead of the 100 square foot requirement <br />'and that they are still requesting the 5 x 9 reader board and stay with the 25 foot height. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendricksen questioned if there are other sizes to chose from. Mr. Clone stated <br />with the square sign they has a couple size option, but with the new sign he thinks the 113 square <br />foot sign is the only option. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendricksen questioned why they don't they use the 10 x 10 square sign. <br />Clone stated that he thinks that a 10 x 10 sign would have to be custom made and with the new <br />logo they are going to be required to change signs and thought it made more sense to put the new <br />sign up noting the an additional 13 square feet is not that much different. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he doesn't think an additional 13 square feet would be a problem. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Chairperson, Leo Anderson reviewed the discussion of the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission. Mr. Anderson stated that it was the Commission's understanding that 100 <br />square feet was ordinance and that Dolphin Realty came in with a request of 189 square feet. <br />The Commission looked for a reason to exceed the 100 square feet and founded that some signs <br />on Highway #10 exceeded the 100 square foot. The Commission was told that Dolphin Realty <br />had an option of an 8x8 or a I2x12 square sign and that a 10 x 10 sign would have to be custom <br />made. The Commission agreed to a 100 square feet for the main sign and an additional 45 <br />square feet for the reader'board and to restrict the size of the signage. The Planning Commission <br />suggested changing the ordinance if the a higher size is becoming standard. <br /> <br />City Council/June 22, I999 <br /> Page 7 of 20 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br /> 'e feet and <br /> dor due to <br /> you travel <br /> <br /> t meeting, <br /> ps in the <br /> ~.estanding <br /> [tional use <br /> ~hen they <br /> ~t); Lano <br /> e a reader <br /> ;Center - <br /> twful, and <br /> However, <br /> :ling <br /> )een <br /> <br /> ~ent <br /> <br /> ated <br /> <br /> Mr. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.