Laserfiche WebLink
Review Boardt The Ramsey Review Board will convene as the Personnel or Finance Committee <br />of the City Council. Appeals to the Review Board's decision shall be directed to the City <br />Council." <br /> <br />As research, Staff reviewed the past municipal facility rentaI experience, and found one rental in <br />June 1998 where the municipal facility was lef~ in poor condition. Last summer a private party <br />rental stuffed styrofoam into the pop machine, and failed to clean up their area following usage <br />of the facility. A $25.00 damage deposit was retained for the failure to clean the facility. <br /> <br />If the Committee, and ultimately the Council, chooses to pursue facility rental for private and <br />for-profit rental, it is important that the City's policy not unlawfully discriminate against whom it <br />allows to use the building or facility. The following are some common areas of concern the <br />League of Minnesota Cities encourages cities to review regarding municipal building rental: <br /> <br />Religious use. A city should allow religious groups access to city buildings on the same <br />basis as other types of groups. If religious groups are not allowed to rent these facilities in <br />the same manner as non-religious groups, someone could accuse the city of religious <br />discrimination. <br />Commercial use. A city can allow a commercial organization to use a city building that is <br />not needed for city purposes. If the city lets commercial organizations use the building for <br />free; it might constitute an unlawful "gift" by the city. <br />Free speech use. Once a city allows non-city use of its building, it cannot refuse to allow a <br />group to use it because of the content of speech or activity. <br />Resident and non-resident use. A city may charge higher fees for non-residents' use if there <br />is a rational basis to support the different treatment, such as the residents also pay other taxes <br />that support the facility. Some cities may give residents first choice in the use of the <br />building. A complete ban of non-residents could be problematic if it has an unlawful <br />discriminatory effect. <br />Financial responsibility. A city may use this as a basis for restricting use of a building if the <br />financial criteria are reasonably related to the city's costs or liabilities for the building or <br />activity. For instance, the city may require a user to show proof of dram shop insurance if <br />liquor will be served and refuse to rent the facility to a person who does not show this proof <br />of insurance. <br /> <br />Committee Action: <br />Motion to recommend approval of the attached facilities rental policy. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br />Motion to approve the attached facilities rental policy. <br /> <br />Agenda Case for Facilities Usage Policy <br />July, 1999 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />