Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 05/10/2011 <br />By: Tim Himmer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Consider Storm Sewer Outlet Revisions Related to City Project #08-33; Ute Street Improvements <br />7. 2. <br />Background: <br />On May 27, 2007 a petition was received by the City Council for the bituminous paving of Ute Street north of <br />179th Lane (terminating at the dead end turn around). City Council directed the preparation of a feasibility study, <br />which was conducted in the fall of 2008. Through the process, many issues were identified and resolved, and the <br />project was constructed last fall. A public hearing was held prior to the levying of assessments upon substantial <br />project completion. Currently only minor punchlist items and turf establishment remain as outstanding items to be <br />completed. <br />Following substantial completion of the project a concern was expressed by a resident requesting revisions to the <br />new storm sewer outlet located on his property. An easement was acquired from the property owner prior to <br />commencing the project, but there were no meaningful conversations as to what the ultimate design and/or <br />appearance would be for this structure. This individual believes that modifications should be made to the outfall to <br />improve aesthetics and reduce his concern for potential liability should someone become injured while accessing <br />the lake through this location. Attached are some photos of the outfall for review. <br />This item was discussed by the Public Works Committee on April 19, 2011 and it was their recommendation to <br />schedule an on -site meeting with the property owners and staff to discuss 2 issues: <br />1. Legal implications of an easement over an easement. Does the constructed storm sewer outfall in our <br />easement affect the use of a private access easement over the same piece of ground? Apparently a private <br />access easement to the lake exists between property owners in the neighborhood, and there was concern that <br />this improvement would hinder the use of this property for lake access. The City Attorney is currently <br />reviewing all pertinent information related to this matter, and may have additional input at the Council <br />meeting. <br />2. A potential outfall revision to address the legal issue described above, and attend to the resident concerns <br />associated with the existing condition. <br />This item should then be scheduled as a stand alone case on the next regular City Council agenda for consideration. <br />Notification: <br />Observations: <br />A site meeting was held on April26, 2011, and a plan developed to narrow the outfall settling basin along the south <br />side to create additional space for lake access. The plan also included that the settling basin get filled with rip -rap to <br />level the grade along the slope, as opposed to leaving it as a hole. <br />These outfall revisions could be completed with the final punchlist items currently underway by the contractor, but <br />they will come with a cost as the final design approved by the Council was implemented per the project <br />specifications. The outfall was constructed, in conjunction with an upstream sump manhole, to improve water <br />quality prior to discharge to Rogers Lake. Staff feels that the outfall is functioning as designed, but revisions could <br />still be incorporated that would alleviate some of the resident's concerns and still comply with the City's approved <br />Lower Rum River Water Management Organization (LRRWMO) permit. The resident has stated that he would like <br />the stilling basin removed all together and have the stormsewer pipes extended down to waters edge. He would also <br />like a different type of rock that isn't as jagged to reduce potential liability concerns from injuries, but there was <br />consensus by all at the meeting that the approach outlined above would improve the situation and be acceptable. <br />