10/05/99 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

8. That there are uniquie circumstances applying to the Subject Property that do not generally apply to other properties in the district; namely, that the street frontage at County Road #63 meets the minimum tot width requirement but access to the proposed building site is obstructed by a County ditch and the fact that City Code discourages access onto a County road when an alternative access is possible. 9. That the unique circumstances do/do not result from the actions of the Applicant. 10. That such variance is/is not necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the R-1 Rural Residential District, namely the ability to have at least one dwelling on a 20 acre parcel. 11. That if granted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is den/ed to other owners of lands, structures or buildings in the same district. 12. That if granted, the variance will/will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of the Ramsey Zoning Chapter or other property in the R-1 Rural Residential District because the Applicant is proposing to locate the home on the Subject Property so as not to obstruct extension of public streets into the Subject Property when it is developed to its ultimate density. 13. That if granted, the variance will/will not substantially increase the congestion of public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially impair property values within the neighborhood. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: and the following were absent: whereupon said resolution was declared duly adopted by the Ramsey Board of Adjustment this the day of ,1999. ATTEST: Chairperson City Administrator