My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/02/2011 - Special Jt Mtg w CC
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/02/2011 - Special Jt Mtg w CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:08:24 AM
Creation date
5/31/2011 8:33:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special Jt Mtg w CC
Document Date
06/02/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minn. Stat. § <br />462.3595. <br />Minn. Stat. § <br />462.3595, subd. 2. <br />Schwardt v. County of <br />Watonwan, 656 <br />N.W.2d 383 (Minn. <br />2003);Yang v. County <br />of Carver, 660 <br />N.W.2d 828 (Minn. <br />Ct. App. <br />2003);Citizens for a <br />Balanced City v. <br />Plymouth <br />Congregational <br />Church, 672 N.W.2d <br />13 (Minn. Ct. App. <br />2003);Trisko v. City of <br />Waite Park, 566 <br />N.W.2d 349 (Minn. <br />Ct. App. 1997). <br />Hubbard <br />Broadcasting, Inc. v. <br />City of Afton, 323 <br />N.W.2d 757 (Minn. <br />1982). <br />See Section IC Role of <br />comprehensive <br />planning in zoning <br />ordinance adoption. <br />SuperAmerica Group, <br />Inc. v. City of Little <br />Canada, 539N.W.2d <br />264 (Minn. Ct. App. <br />1995). <br />In re Livingood, 594 <br />N.W.2d 889 (Minn. <br />1999). <br />Minn. Stat. § <br />462.3595, subd. 4 <br />The city must grant the CUP if the applicant satisfies all the conditions <br />established in the ordinance. <br />A city may deny a CUP if the proposed use: <br />• Does not meet the specific standards or conditions established in the <br />zoning ordinance; <br />• Is not consistent with the city's officially adopted comprehensive plan; <br />• Endangers or is not compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the <br />public. <br />When a local government denies a landowner a CUP without sufficient <br />evidence to support its decision, a court can order the issuance of the permit <br />subject to reasonable conditions. <br />Once a CUP is granted, a certified copy of the CUP (including a detailed list <br />of all applicable conditions) must be recorded with the county recorder or the <br />registrar of titles, and must include a legal description of the land. <br />ZONING GUIDE FOR CITIES 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.