My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/24/1998
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1998
>
Agenda - Council - 02/24/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 3:33:26 PM
Creation date
9/16/2003 12:17:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/24/1998
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ramsey Senior Housing Market Study <br /> <br />January, 1998 <br /> <br />SENIOR HOUSING MARKET REVIEW <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Market potential for senior housing, like any type of housing, is a function of supply and demand. The <br />previous Section analyzed data related to demand for senior housing. Due to the lack of market rate <br />existing senior projects within the study area, this Section reviews the existing supply of senior housing in <br />communities in and adjacent to the study area. This information, combined with data from our <br />demographic analysis, will be used to assess the potential for a project in Ramsey. <br /> <br />Overview of Senior Housing in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area <br /> <br />The supply of senior housing has become highly diversified as developers, non-profit community <br />organizations, health care providers and government agencies have attempted to provide housing with <br />different levels of support services and rents to appeal to sub-markets within the senior population. Not <br />long ago, there was no housing for independent seniors and the only alternatives for frail elderly needing <br />support services were nursing homes and board and care homes. Today the product choice has widened to <br />provide alternatives for young, healthy seniors not needing support services but who desire a living <br />environment limited to mature adults as well as alternatives for older seniors needing various levels of <br />support services. <br /> <br />The first senior housing projects developed on a wide scale were subsidized through the federal <br />government's Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Substantial construction occurred <br />during the 1970's and 1980's with subsidies from the federal government under the Section 8 program, <br />ot~en used in conjunction with financing assistance or mortgage guarantees such as the 221 d3 or 236 <br />programs. Section 8 projects have maximum rents of 30 percent of the tenant's adjusted gross income. <br />Generally, these buildings do not offer any support services although in many communities a congregate <br />dining site for the entire community has been established within the building. Today, few alternatives are <br />available from the federal government for the financing of senior housing. The only direct assistance is <br />through the Section 202 program which provides Iow interest loans to non-profit sponsors to provide <br />housing for seniors and handicapped persons. Usually administered in conjunction with the Section 8 <br />program, owners are required to set rents within established HUD guidelines. <br /> <br />Beginning in the 1980's, the focus shit~ed to market rate senior housing development; housing that provided <br />more amenities and services than were available at the subsidized buildings. Projects were developed by <br />both private for profit developers, as well as non-profit organizations such as church groups. <br /> <br />The first market rate senior housing projects developed in the metropolitan area were geared towards the <br />frail elderly. Usually associated with nursing homes (as many new projects are today), these buildings <br />were marketed to seniors who needed support services but who did not require the medical services or daily <br />monitoring of a nursing home. Although still somewhat independent, these frail seniors required some sort <br />of assistance such as housekeeping, daily check-in or transportation to stores and personal business or <br />medical appointments. Activity programs, meals, health checks and other supportive services were usually <br />included in the rent. Although high in cost, this type of housing was (and still is) considerably cheaper than <br />nursing home care and far more fulfilling to seniors who still desire some independence. <br /> <br />The oldest Twin Cities senior project opened in 1965 under the sponsorship of Heritage of Edina Nursing <br />Home. Today this complex has a total of 214 units in three buildings. Sutton Place, affiliated with <br /> <br />Community Partners Research, Inc. 23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.