My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/27/1998
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1998
>
Agenda - Council - 10/27/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 3:42:16 PM
Creation date
9/18/2003 7:53:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/27/1998
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />since the summer months. He explained that due to the MnDOT request for less access, and if the <br />City were to say they want more study on a service road, it would place Burger King in a difficuk <br />position as well. He stated that while he may agree with the need for a service road, he questions <br />the impact <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen stated this argument has often been used on City Councils and <br />forces bad planning decisions which the City has to live with for many years. She asked if it <br />makes sense to ask questions now since once the building is construct it costs more to undo it. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked if the consultant has made a recommendation on this issue. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik stated they have not. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated it would not hurt for the City Planner to address the issue of <br />whether there should be a frontage road. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated the City has been working on this for a long time and asked why the issue of <br />a frontage road is just now being raised. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen stated that for the first time she has the benefit of seeing what is in <br />the Comprehensive Plan and being proposed by the business entity, City, MnDOT and the City <br />Planner. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted the Council was previously presented with the site plan. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sherman stated it is correct that the site plan has already been <br />approved. She stated that there is some design potential so this idea could be addressed with the <br />developer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen stated she is not willing to back off her concerns regarding a service <br />road, which she feels is a valid concern. She stated if this is approved tonight it could be <br />contingent upon redesigning, since a septic system is not needed, and the Comprehensive Plan <br />consultant can address whether there should be a frontage road. She stated that this service road <br />and how T.H. #10 is treated is vitally important and needs to be correctly and adequately <br />addressed. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich suggested approval be contingent upon those criteria. He noted this is a <br />preliminary agreement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen noted that a number of things have changed such as it starting out <br />with a septic system which was then eliminated when the sewer service was extended. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated his understanding there was not enough room at this intersection to <br />accommodate a service road. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski advised that MnDOT's concern was the potential for conflict with accelerating <br /> <br />City Council/October 13, 1998 <br /> Page 17 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.