Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />:1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />CASE #4 <br /> <br />REPORT OF WATER STUDY CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS <br /> By: Steven J. Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The City has budgeted $20,000 in 1998 to perform an update of the City's comprehensive water <br />study. The purpose of this case is to provide an update on the consultant selection process and <br />provide an opportunity for Committee input to this process. Attached is a copy of a request for <br />qualifications which has been sent to seven engineering firms which are listed below: <br /> <br />Compan. y Contact <br /> <br />Barr Engineering <br />Bolton & Menk <br />OSM Associates, Inc. <br />Progressive Consulting Engineers, Inc. <br />S.E.H., Inc. <br />T.K.D.A. <br />Westwood Professional Services, Inc. <br /> <br />Mr. Steve Klein, P.E. <br />Mr. Robert Brown, P.E. <br />Mr. John Mentor, P.E. <br />Mr. Naeem Qureshi, P.E. <br />Mr. James Norton, P.E. <br />Mr. Dick Sobiek, P.E. <br />Mr. Tim Korby, P.E. <br /> <br />As stated within the request letter, it is Staff's intention to select a short list of consultants on the <br />basis of a rating of their qualifications. It is then our intention to make the final selection from <br />this short list. A number of potential processes are available to make this final selection. <br />Generally, at a minimum, a written proposal from each consultant, providing a detailed approach <br />to the study, along with a project budget would be requested. Additionally, oral interviews could <br />also be a part of the selection process. <br /> <br />Committee Action: <br /> <br />None required; however, the Committee may wish to provide input on the consultant selection <br />process. <br /> <br />Reviewed By: <br />City Administrator <br />Director of Public Works <br /> <br />RB: 11/17/98 <br /> <br /> <br />