My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/12/1998 - Special Meeting
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/12/1998 - Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:09:38 AM
Creation date
9/18/2003 9:59:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special Meeting
Document Date
03/12/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
That the preliminary site plan also reveals a future outside storage area in the most westerly <br />comer of the site that is proposed to be enclosed with a privacy fence; outside storage is <br />permitted in the B-1 Business D/strict but is restricted to 10% of the lot area and not to <br />exceed an area equivalent to the area of the principal building. <br /> <br />9. That outside parking of tracks may be anticipated with the type of business proposed and'the <br /> B-1 Business District does permit track parking. <br /> <br />10. That the architectural standards in the business district require natural or prefabricated stone <br /> on building exteriors; any other material is subject to City Council approval. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />That the Applicant is proposing to construct the exterior walls with a combination of rock <br />face concrete masonry units and vinyl siding, which is comparable to or exceeds the <br />standards of other commercial buildings in the area, but requires City Council approval of the <br />vinyl siding. <br /> <br />I2. That the proposed use will/will not be unduly dangerous or detrimental to persons residing or <br /> working in the vicinity of the use, or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />i3. That the proposed use will/will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment or <br /> market value of any surrounding property. <br /> <br />I4. <br /> <br />That the proposed use wilFwill not be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as <br />to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the <br />general vicinity and will/will not change the essential character of the area. <br /> <br />15. That the proposed use will/will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future <br /> neighboring uses. <br /> <br />16. That the proposed use will/will noi'be a substantial improvement to the property. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />That the proposed use Mil/MI1 not be served adequately by essential public facilities and <br />services, such as highways, streets, police and fire protection. <br /> <br />I8. <br /> <br />That the proposed use' will/will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for <br />public facilities and services and will/will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the <br />community. <br /> <br />19. That the proposed use will/will not involve uses, activities and equipment that will be <br /> detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production <br /> oftrattie, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. <br /> <br />The motion for the <br />Councilmember <br />thereofi <br /> <br />adoption of the foregoing findings of fact was duly seconded by <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.