Laserfiche WebLink
MARCH 1998 <br /> <br />AMERICAN <br />PLANNING <br />ASSOCIATION <br /> <br />"Nobody Told Me. They <br />Changedthe Zon,ng!' <br /> <br />By Fay Dolnick <br /> <br />As communities grow, zoning ordinances should remain <br />flexible enough to meet changing land-use needs. As <br />stated in the Standard State Enabling Act of 1926, "provision <br />must be made for changing the regulations as conditions change <br />or new conditions arise, otherwise zoning would be a 'strait- <br />jacket' and a detriment to a community instead of an asset." <br /> Neighborhood rezoning and other land-me changes can have a <br />significant, even adverse, impact on the lives and properties of area <br />residents. To lessen the probability of such impacts, public hearings <br />on proposed zoning changes are normally required by state statute. <br /> <br />Shoreline, Washington, uses bold. lettering to catch th'e attention of <br />passersby and explicit detaih for those who take a closer look at a <br />proposed land-use action. <br /> <br />The purpose of these hearings is to obtain additional information <br />regarding the proposed change for the derision makers and to <br />enable citizens to express concern or ask questions. <br /> The most effective hearings happen when residents are <br />informed well in advance of the hearing's date, time, and <br />location. The identification of the affected property and the <br />proposed land-use change are important and relevant facts to <br />report to the public. <br /> This issue of Zoning News discusses the various methods <br />communities can employ to communicate news of an <br />impending zoning change to the public and examines a variety <br />of procedures used in ordinances. <br /> <br /> Overview <br /> The Standard State Enabling Act recommends a 15-day advance <br /> notice of a public hearing through a general circulation <br />,~paper, but also notes that this can vary to suit local needs. <br /> <br /> he most effective hearings <br /> happen wheh residents are <br /> informed well in advance of the <br />hearing's date, time, and <br />location. The identification of the <br /> affected properly and the <br /> proposed land-use change are <br /> important and relevant facts to <br /> report to the public. <br /> <br />Although state statutes typically require public hearing notices, <br />they leave the details to the municipal ordinance. <br /> Municipalities invariably use one or more of the following <br />methods to notify the public of a proposed land use change: <br /> <br />· advertisements in a general circulation newspaper; <br />· mailings to property owners most likely affected by the change; <br />· posting a sign on the property site with the proposed change. <br /> <br /> Charles Reed, editor and publisher of The ZaningReport, has <br />pointed out that based on the number of people who appear <br />and testify at hearings, newspaper notices are the least effective <br />method of notification. <br /> The time allowed for notification of a forthcoming hearing <br />can range from seven to 30 days before the hearing takes place. <br />However, most notifications occur 10 to 15 days before the <br />hearing. The specified radius of an affected prqperty, about <br />which a property owner must be notified, rangei from 1.00 feet <br />to 700 feet, with a median of 300 feet. <br /> Mailings of a notification are usually sent via post using <br />either first class or certified mail. Administrative costs associated <br />with mailing lists and postage are assumed either by the <br />municipality or by the applicant for the rezoning. <br /> When the number of persons to be notified becomes <br />excessive, communities employ more practical and cost-effective <br />methods of public notification, For example, Santa Cruz, <br />California, opts for a newspaper advertisement rather than a <br />mass mailing when notification numbers exceed 1,000. <br /> Regulations for the onsite sign can range from a simple <br />instruction that it be placed prominently on the affected site to <br />very detailed requirements on the size, lettering style, textual <br />information, and placement of the sign in relation to the street <br />and the adjoining properties. Some ordinances provide detailed <br />drawings of sign requirements. <br /> Although the municipal planning and development department <br />may provide the sign, the applicant usually bears the responsibility <br />and costs for placing it. Some municipalities ask the applicant to <br />supply a signed affidavit stating that the sign has been posted and <br />that it conforms to the municipa] standards. <br /> <br /> <br />