Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance Sampler <br />The following are examples of provisions for public notification <br />of proposed rezonings. Zoning News chose them for their <br />concise language and simple form. Despite this simplicity, the <br />ability to provide sufficient information is not compromised. <br /> Scottsdale, Arizona. Arizona's state statute requires that <br />municipalities notify the public of a land-use change through <br />"standard" channels, which typically include a notice in the <br />local newspaper, an onsite sign posting, and a first class mailing <br />to all property owners within :300 feet of the site. <br /> To ensure that notice of the proposed land-use change is widely <br />circulated, Scottsdale's standards exceed what is often found in local <br />ordinances. Two legal notices are published in the local newspaper <br />30 and 15 days prior to the hearing. Property owners within 300 <br />feet of the proposed rezoning site are notified at least 30 days prior <br />to the hearing, and agendas for the hearings are posted in four <br />public locations prior to its commencement. <br /> To guarantee public awareness of these changes, Scottsdale <br />made effective in February ! 997 the requirement that an <br />application sign be a four-foot-by-four-foot "cardinal" red <br />plywood sign containing all pertinent information in language <br />understandable to the public. The laminated sign will be erected <br />at least 15 days prior to the hearing. Scottsdale applicants are <br /> <br /> NOTICE QF.~ROPOSED LAND USE ACTIO~ <br />AlJdresl, ra AY KI. '___ _-~ . <br /> <br />TOg <br /> <br />F~ ~E AND APPROX~ ~ ~ ~ <br />~ · , -,L ~ ' . ~la. <br /> <br />Notification is thwarted if the sign is not properly maintained, as with <br />this notice ora proposed land-use action in Seattk. <br /> <br />provided with specifications as to its design, including the six- <br />inch size of the lettering, textual requirements such as the date, <br />place, and time of the hearing, and the name and phone <br />number of the applicant. <br /> The applicant is responsible for the cost of the sign and for <br />arrangements to have it installed. He or she is also obliged to <br />sign an affidavit verifying that the sign has been posted. The <br />affidavit is returned to the community development department <br />with a photograph of the sign and a copy of the signed contract <br />with a sign vendor approved by the city. <br /> Scotudale's larger red signs replaced those that were <br />considerably smaller and less weather-resistant. Improved visibility <br />to passing motorists is instrumental in reaching a wider public, a <br />standard that appears to be paying dividends. The signs have <br />resulted in increased attendance at Scottsdale's public hearings. <br /> Scottsdale's community development department goes one step <br />further to keep the public abreast of local issues by offering a "site <br />posting hot line." The objective of this telephone sen'ice is to keep <br />residents informed about zoning changes. The success of <br />Scottsdale's hotline and other methods of effectively reporting land- <br />use changes lies not only in service creatMty, but in the user- <br /> <br />friendly nature and simplicity of the zoning text as well. <br />Complicated language is largely avoided in the Scottsdale code. <br /> Mesa, Arizona. Mesa requires the applicant to post the <br />notification of a land-use change at his or her own cost, 14 days <br />before the planning and zoning board meeting. Local standards <br />require that the sign measure four feet by four feet when the <br />land-use change involves parcels of 10 acres or more. The color <br />scheme must be white with one to four-inch black letters and <br />prominent enough to be visible to passing motorists. <br /> Although providing the sign is voluntary for the developer, <br />Mesa planner Gordon Sheffield says that cooperation is never a <br />problem. The developer is also responsible for removing the <br />sign seven days after the city council meeting. To discourage <br />wastefulness, the planning department recommends that the <br />signs be recycled to other applicants whenever possible. <br /> Mesa applicants are responsible for drafting a letter to all <br />property owners within 300 square feet of the site. The first- <br />class mailing should include an 8-by-I 1 inch photograph of the <br />site plan. The planning and community development <br />department provides a sample letter and sign placement map as <br />well as detailed design guidelines for the sign. These <br />requirements are not established by ordinance but are a matter <br />of policy set by the local legislative body, and to deviate from <br />these requirements is grounds for continuation of the case until <br />they are met. <br /> Seattle, Washington. Seattle's notification procedures differ <br />slightly from usual practices. Notice ora proposed land-use <br />action is issued in the city's Land-Use Information Bulletin. <br />Although the publication is not in general circulation, it is <br />widely distributed to community groups and to land-use lawyers <br />in the Seattle region. The information is also posted on a web <br />site visited by businesses, activist groups, and individuals <br />interested in Seattle's land-use issues. <br /> To contain costs, a random mailing of notices is conducted <br />for property owners within 300 feet of the site. Each notice is <br />sent out by the planning department, but the applicant pays for <br />the cost of postage through application fees. Applicants are also <br />responsible for the costs of the onsite sign, which must be eight <br />feet by four feet in size, made of white plastic, and inscribed <br />with black vinyl lettering. The sign contains a drawing of the <br />site map, the site's address, the name and phone number of the <br />applicant, and a description and project number of the pro- <br />posed development. A municipal telephone number is also <br />provided for interested persons to call with questions. <br /> Seattle requires that the signs draw the attention of both <br />local motorists and individuals from outside the neighborhood <br />who may not be familiar with the area. The city contracts with a <br />local sign company to produce the signs and charges the <br />applicant a nominal fee of $295. <br /> Bellevue, Washington. Bellevue's notification is posted in a <br />general circulation newspaper 14 days before a hearing. Property <br />owners within 200 feet of project sites are sent the notification, <br />which contairis a complete description of the project and its <br />location. Neighborhood groups, community clubs, or other <br />citizen groups with a stake in local land-use actions also receive <br />notice of the impending change. <br /> Onsite signs are the responsibility of the developer and must <br />also be in place 14 days before a hearing. Subsequent removal of <br />the signs is required within seven days after a decision is reached <br />over the land-use change. Bellevue's regulations specify a four- <br />foot-by-four-foot sign that is double-sided and visible from the <br />street. The applicant must also file a "certificate of installation" <br />with the city as proof that the sign has been correctly installed. <br /> <br /> <br />