Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY <br />STRUCTURE PRIOR TO A PRINCIPAL BUILDING AND TO EXCEED THE TOTAL <br />ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SPACE AND THE MAXIMUM SINGLE ACCESSORY <br />STRUCTURE SIZE RESTRICTIONS ON A LOT; CASE OF JIM REICHERT <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />On October 19, 1998, the City received an application from Jim Reichert for a conditional use <br />permit to construct an accessory structure prior to a principal building or dwelling, exceed the <br />total accessory structure/garage space allowed, and the maximum single accessory structure size <br />restrictions on a vacant parcel he owns just south of his homestead at 16491 Uranium Street <br />N.W. The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) Site location map <br />b) Site Plan <br />c) Proposed findings of fact <br /> <br />Notification: <br /> <br />In accordance with State Statute, City Staff attempted to notify property owners within 350 feet <br />of the subject property of the public heating and request for a conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />Mr. Reichert is proposing to construct a 1,920 square foot garage on a 1.04 acre vacant parcel he <br />owns south of his homestead. He is proposing to store his commercial vehicles and equipment in <br />this new garage. The garage exceeds the total allowable garage space allowed on the property by <br />256 square feet and the maximum building size by 1,120 square feet. The City has granted <br />overages before ranging from 112 square feet to 26,395 square feet overall, and 48 square feet to <br />12,309 square feet on any one building. The overages granted in cases similar to Mr. Reichert <br />range from 112 to 372 square feet overall and 48 to 400 square feet on any one building. <br /> <br />In a similar situation, the City recently granted a conditional use permit for an accessory building <br />prior to a principal building to a homeowner that owned the vacant lot next door. However, the <br />building proposed was to replace a nonconforming building that incurred damages from summer <br />storms. In addition, the permit required the accessory building developed on the vacant lot to be <br />placed so that a home could be built on the lot in the future that would comply with structure <br />setback requirements. According to the Building Official, it would be a costly process to build a <br />home on Mr. Reichert's vacant lot because of the substandard soils. Additionally, it would <br />require an experimental septic system and they are cumbersome, and the placement of the <br />accessory structure further limits the ability to ever build a home on the property. <br /> <br /> <br />