My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03/17/98
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Road and Bridge Committee
>
Agendas
>
1998
>
03/17/98
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2025 11:15:34 AM
Creation date
9/18/2003 11:32:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Road and Bridge Committee
Document Date
03/17/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Diagonal Dlverters <br /> <br />Cul-de-Sac Closures <br /> <br />intersection to convert the <br />intersection into two unconnected <br />streets, each making a sharp turn. <br />Its primary purpose is to make <br />travel through a neighborhood <br />circuitous, while not preventing <br />such travel. Used alone, the <br />diverters will affect only the two <br />specific streets involved. This <br />application is most effective in <br />reducing traffic volumes if used as <br />part of a planned system for the <br />neighborhood that will discourage <br />through traffic. <br /> Smith et al. (1980, 31) note that "In <br />a system of devices, traffic on streets <br />with diverters can be reduced from <br />between 20 to 70 percent depending <br />on the system of devices in the area." <br />Diverters are effective in reducing <br />traffic volumes, whereas speed is <br />reduced only in the immediate <br />vicinity of the divdrter, within about <br />200-300 feet. Studies done in Seattle, <br />Washington, and Richmond and <br />Berkeley, California, have shown a <br />significant r&iuction in the number <br />of accidents in the neighborhoods. <br />Usually, however, the actual number <br />in each case was small originally <br />(Smith et al. 1980, 31). <br /> In order to have diverters function <br /> safely and effectively, they should <br /> incorporate the following features: <br /> · Visibility. Devices should have <br /> painted curbs, rails, reflectors, <br /> directional signs, street lights, <br /> and elevated landscaping. <br /> <br /> · Delineation. Centerline pavement <br /> striping and, where possible, <br /> pavement buttons are helpful in <br /> identifying the driving path. <br /> <br /> · Emergency vehicle access. The <br /> design of the diverter should <br /> allow for passage of emergency <br /> vehicles while restricting <br /> automobile passage. <br /> <br /> · Pedestrian, bicycle, and disabled <br /> access. Sidewalks across the <br /> diverter should allow such access. <br /> <br /> ad-end Streets or Cul-de-sacs <br /> In some communities, traffic <br /> volumes in older residential areas <br /> have become so problematic that <br /> streets have been converted to dead- <br /> ends or cul-de-sacs to prevent cut- <br /> through traffic. A cul-de-sac is a <br /> complete barrier of a street at an <br /> intersection or mid-block that <br /> leaves the block open to local traffic <br /> <br />at one end while physically <br />restricting through traffic. Studies <br />have shown cul-de-sacs or dead- <br />end streets to be very effective in <br />reducing traffic volumes. <br /> Due to the need for adequate <br />turning radius, retrofitting an <br />existing street can be very e~, pensive. <br />On existing streets, it is often the case <br />that only an 18- to 20-foot turning <br />radius can be provided, whereas in <br />new subdivisions 35 feet (10.5 m) is <br />standard. The appropriate length of a <br />street that can be dead-ended should <br />be determined by traffic volume and <br />the number of houses on the street. <br />In general, however; cul-de-sacs <br />should probably not be installed on <br />streets longer than 500 feet when lots <br />are 50 feet wide, meaning there <br />would be approximately 20 houses <br />on a street generating eight t~ 10 <br />vehicle trips per day (NAHB 1990, <br />55). Streets longer than 500 feet tend <br />to lose the advantages of inst~lllng a <br />cul-de-sac because there are likely to <br />be increases in traffic speeds and <br />mid-block turnar~unds, a potential <br />safety hazard. The number of <br />properties on a longer street also <br />means an increase in the volume of . <br />trips on that street, again reducing <br />the safety factor that the cul-de-sac <br />should bring. <br /> A cul-de-sac should be clearly <br /> identified by signs indicating that <br /> the street is not a through street. In <br /> some cases, provision for passage <br /> of emergen.c~, vekicles through the <br /> cul-de-sac iixa-y be desirable. <br /> Existing movement of pedestrians, <br /> bicyclists, and people with <br /> disabilities will need to be <br /> evaluated and accommodated by <br /> provision of through sidewalks <br /> and/or ramps. <br /> The use of dead-end streets and <br /> cul-de-sacs to reduce traffic <br /> volumes is one of the most <br /> expensive and least desirable <br /> techniques employed for traffic <br /> calming due to issues of <br /> accessibility for emergency <br /> vehicles, buses, etc. Caution should <br /> be employed in making use of this <br /> technique. <br /> <br />Semi-diverters, Neck-downs, Chicanes, <br />Chokers, and Protected Parking <br /> A serai, diverter is a barrier to <br />traffic at the intersection of two <br />streets in which one direction of the <br />street is blocked, but traffic from <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.