My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03/17/98
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Road and Bridge Committee
>
Agendas
>
1998
>
03/17/98
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2025 11:15:34 AM
Creation date
9/18/2003 11:32:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Road and Bridge Committee
Document Date
03/17/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STREET CLOSURE <br /> <br />CHAPTER <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />TYPE 1 ~ <br /> <br /> ~,e~t~d St <br /> <br />TYPE 2. <br /> <br /> A street 'closure, for the purpose of the <br /> Residential Neighborhood Traffic Control <br /> Tool Box, is defined as dosing a street either <br /> at one end or the other, or at a mid-block <br /> location. The purpose is to eliminate un- <br /> wanted through traffic. <br /> <br />Street closing is a fairly common traffic con- <br />trol technique. It is well documented in the <br />"Residential Street Design & Traffic Control" <br />published by Prentice Hall (1989). There are <br />two basic types of closure to consider. Type 1 <br />is defined as being near to the main street. <br />The closed street can no longer gain access to <br />or from the main street. Type 2 is defined as <br />being a far closure. The closed street can only <br />gain access to the main street. Type 1 is most .' <br />effective at reducing through traffic volumes. <br /> <br /> Effects <br />Volumes. The impact on traffic volume is <br />drastic, reducing traffic volume to that which <br />is generated by the land use on the abutting <br />properties. To be most effective, the closure <br />must be visible to the drivers, so that the <br />driver does not run onto the street and then <br />finds it to be a dead-end. A "dead-end" sign <br />may be needed. Sufficient capacity on the <br />alternative route is also needed. <br /> <br /> Speed. Again, the impact is drastic, reducing <br /> the speed to that normally associated with <br /> short dead-end residential streets. <br /> <br />Traffic Noise, Air Quality and Energy Con- <br />sumption. There-should be a dramatic <br />'reduction in noise directly related to the <br />reduction in traffic VOlumes. This is also ac- <br />complished with an increase in air quality. <br /> <br />Energy Consumption. No change in energy <br />consumption is expected since vehicle trips <br />are not eliminated, but merely rerouted to <br />main streets. <br /> <br />Traffic Safety. There is a substantial increase <br />in traffic safety. The neighborhood abutting <br />the closed street has less traffic and the traffic <br />that remains is all local, usually well known <br />amongst themselves. There is also a safety <br />improvement to the main street. Traffic <br />entering or exiting the main street is <br />eliminated at the closed street and relocated <br />at adjacent intersection with better traffic con- <br />troL This portion of traffic safety has been the <br />driving force in the majority of street closures <br />described in the case study section. <br /> <br />Community Reaction. Reaction from people <br />who live on the street is usually very positive. <br />It is important to have all the residents in- <br /> <br />Neighborhood Traffic Control <br /> <br />January 1994 <br /> <br />20-1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.