11/02/98 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

lC) 6. That the Applicants are proposing to construct a 12' x 16' utility shed approximately 35 feet from the front property line. That there are special conditions applying to the Subject Property that do not generally apply to other properties in the district; namely the side and rear yards contain sharply declining topography, mature tree growth, drainfield and altemative drainfield locations. 8. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicants. 9. That similar variances have been granted in the R-I Rural Residential District in the City of Ramsey. 10. That literal interpretation of the provisions of City Code would deprive the Applicants of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district, namely the right to have an accessory building on the premises. 11. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. 12. That if granted, the variance will/will not permit a use that is prohibited in the R-1 Rural Residential District. 13. That if granted, the variance will/will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. 14. That if granted, the variance will/will not unreasonably increase the congestion in the public street. 15. That if granted, the variance will/wilt not increase the danger of fLre or endanger the public safety. 16. That if granted, the variance will/will not unreasonably diminish property values in the neighborhood. 17. That if granted, the variance will/will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. t 8. That, if granted, the variance will/will not grant the Applicants any special privilege that is denied to other owners of land in the same district. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member ., and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: RESOLUTION #98-11- Page 2 of 3