Laserfiche WebLink
2) <br /> <br />Update on signalization of Dysprosium/C.IL #116 Intersection <br /> <br />The County has determined warrants for signalization have been met for the intersection of <br />Dysprosium and C.R. #1t6. This, along with others, will be reviewed by the County. He has <br />suggested the intersection of C.R. #57 and C.R. #116 also be studied for signalization warrants in <br />1998. <br /> <br />3) Update on T.H. g47 Projects <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski noted the City Attorney will proceed with acquisition of rights-of-way necessary <br />for the T.H. #47 project. The consultants will be directed to proceed with their plans. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman and seconded by Councilmember Beahcn to approve the <br />plan for the City Attorney to proceed with acquisition of rights-of-way necessary for the project <br />and directing the consultants to proceed with their plans. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Zimmerman, Beahen, and Haas <br />Steffen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />4) 1998 Street Maintenance Program <br /> <br />The 1998 Street Maintenance Program was reviewed at the Road and Bridge Committee. The <br />Program involves seal coating on a number of subdivisions throughout the City. Five projects <br />will be overlaid, one of which is 5.5 miles of MSA Street systems to include 167th Avenue and <br />Ramsey Boulevard, 153rd Avenue from C.R. #5 to Roanoke Street and 155th Avenue west of <br />Ramsey Boulevard. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen stated previously it was discussed that all of these types of projects <br />would be taken out of the general fund. She asked if this was done, could the developer's escrow <br />fees be used. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich stated in the past some escrow fees were applied and assessments were reduced. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamee stated the escrow goes to benefit the appropriate project. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich stated there is an agreement written when escrow fees are paid. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich advised of a District Court judgment from Dakota County stating the City of <br />Eagan did not have to refund the impact fees since the developers were not coerced into paying <br />the fees to the City. The City is not required to pay it back. Mr. Goodrich stated similar <br />situations have occurred in Ramsey. <br /> <br />Couneilmember Zimmerman noted in new developments, no impact fees can be charged. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Beahen and seconded by Councilmember Zimmerman, to direct the <br />City Engineer to prepare a feasibility study for the 1998 Street Maintenance Program. <br /> <br />City Council/January 27, 1998 <br /> Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />