Agenda - Council - 02/25/1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

02/20/97 THU 12:28 FAX City F_ugineer Jankowski suggested amending the moffatt to state that the contractor shall remove accumulations from the roadway as directed by the City Engineer, even though in his opinion he believes this matter to the County's responsibility. Commissioner Deemer stated that if road cleanup is not under City authority, he would not vote for the amendment. Chairperson Bawden stated that the same language should be used for the hauling permit on County Koad 57. The motion was not seconded and did not carry. Motion of Amendment to the Main Motion by Commissioner LaDue, seconded by Commissioner Deemer to add County Road 5 and T_T-L 47 to be cleaned on a daily basis. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners La.Due, Deemer, Holland, leasen, Terry, and Thomd. Voting no: None. Absent: None. Main Motion by Commissioner Deemer, seconded by Commisaioner Holland to amend Condition No. 9 to require the contractor to clean County Road 63, County Road 5 and T,H. 47 of debris and dirt on a daily basis. Motion caw/ed. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Com~ssioners Deemer, Holland, Jensen, La,Due, Terry, and Thomd. Voting no: None. Absent: None. Motion by Commiss{oner Deemer, seconded by Commissioner Terry to recommend approval of the amended conditions of the Conditional Use Permit. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, Holland, Yensen, LaDue, and Thomd. Voting no: None, Absent: None. Case #2: Request far Sketch Plan Approval of Apple Ridge; Case of Good Value /tomes Zoning Administrator Frolik reported subrmttal ora ~4etch plan for approval fi~om Mr. Peterson representing Good Value Homes. The~p~/consists of approximately 60 acres located witkin MUSA and eligible for development of(~lots. The proposal is to develop I47 lots. At the time of the preliminary plat approval, the City will verify compliance with all code requirements. The Park Commission will review the plan to determ;ne the park dec[ication at their meeting on February 13, 3997. The most signLficant issue is the streets and access to the development. City Enginecr ~lankowski stated that one of the biggest issmes with neigl~bors is access and traflSc impact on the neighborhooct Traffic studies anticipate 10 trips a day are generated from each home, which would mean 1,400 to 1,500 additional trips per day. Two access points are proposed in the nortk 1) 158th Lane and 2) 157th Lane. These are stubbed streets for future connection to the existhag service road adjacent to l-fighway 47 with access tofUtti'Lane, To the south, this development could be connected to future development on 156ih L~/e~o.rh Planning Commission/February 4, 1997 Page 5 of I5 ~005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I