My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/25/1997
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1997
>
Agenda - Council - 02/25/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 4:13:47 PM
Creation date
9/19/2003 9:14:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/25/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A number of people said they would not have recommended the Sergeant for the ChieFs <br />position in years past. When he was appointed Sergeant, there was a rough transition <br />period. No one, including him, knew exactly what a sergeant was supposed to do and he <br />came across as authoritarian and heavy handed. With the blessing of the Chief, the <br />officers shared their concerns with the Sergeant. He listened and responded by adapting <br />his style. It is his willingness and his ability to change for the betterment of the <br />department, employees say, that gives them confidence they can work with him as Chief. <br />They have a history of shared problem solving that gives them a good foundation for <br />confronting challenges in the future. <br /> <br />People inside and outside the department say that the way this position is filled will send <br />a message to all City employees. If a qualified insider is passed over, they say, morale <br />will plummet. There will be no incentive to keep growing professionally if there is no <br />chance for advancement inside the organization. <br /> <br />Officers were asked about the importance of formal education. How can the City require <br />less formal education from its Police Chief than from its Police Officers? How will <br />rookies feel about working for someone who has less formal education than they do? <br />Overwhelmingly, people agreed that education was important but that credentials are no <br />guarantee of success in the position. Common sense, street experience and open <br />mindedness are more important than a degree, although it was agreed that over time <br />education and training will become increasingly important in the Police Chief's position. <br />As for rookies, several people said that once new officers are exposed to the Sergeant's <br />skills on the street, they respect him, regardless of his educational background. <br /> <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Based on the overwhelming consistency of the information gathered during interviews, <br />most of which lasted for 45 to 60 minutes, there appears to be no compelling reason to fill <br />the Police Chief opening from outside the organization. The department does not appear <br />to be "broken" at this point, and making change for the sake of change seems to have <br />more costs than benefits. <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the City Council conduct an interview process with Sergeant <br />David Gustafson and any other internal candidates who come forward for the Police <br />Chief position. Given the current job description, it is assumed there will be only one <br />internal candidate but the process must allow for others. The goals of the process would <br />be: <br /> * That City Council and City staff work with the Police Chief candidate to clearly <br /> establish expectations for the department and the Police Chief; <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.