Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />PC, CASE #: 5 <br /> <br />CONSIDER POSSIBLE CHANGES TO COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE TAKING <br /> By: Linda Waite Smith, Administrative Services Manager <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />In the past, minutes of the City Council meetings were sometimes not available until several <br />weeks after the meeting. The City Council requested, in January 1997, that staff find a way to <br />provide the minutes for each meeting in the agenda packet for the next meeting. To date, we <br />have been able 'to remain current. The challenge now will be to continue to deliver the minutes <br />in. a timely manner, given the fluctuation in workload requirements. The following actions will <br />help us achieve that goal. <br /> <br />1. Ensure that minute preparation remains a top priority for the Recording Secretary and <br />take the necessary steps to provide her with the time needed to do the job. In the past, her <br />understanding has been that she should work on minutes as time allows. <br /> <br />2. Hire a minute taking service when the Recording Secretary has a conflicting time demand <br />such as coordinating an election. <br /> <br />h~ Jan'um¥ I distributed an analysis of the cost of having a contract service take minutes for the <br />actual Council. meetings held in 1996. My calculations assumed that City staff would continue to <br />t~ake minutes fbr Personnel, Finance and Road & Bridge committee meetings. <br /> <br />When. the Recording Secretary is absent, we hire Timesavers minute taking service which <br />charges by the amount of time spent at the meeting and the number of pages of minutes. If <br />'i",(mr:r;avers had done the minutes for the first Council meeting each month in 1996, it would <br />have cost $2,891.50; minutes for the second meeting of each month would have cost $1,974.00. <br />The charge for taking minutes at all Council meetings would have been $4,865.50. Timesavers <br />experiences more turnover in staff thari the City does, therefore there is better continuity if the <br />Recording Secretary takes the meeting minutes. It is one of the Recording Secretary's <br />assignments to extract all staff directives from her meeting notes and distribute them the day <br />after 'he Council meeting. This process would be slowed by several days if she had to wait for <br />'the minutes. Alternatively, we would have to pay extra to have the contract service extract staff <br />directives. <br /> <br />Theoretically, we could assign one of the other clerical staff members to take minutes in the <br />Recording Secretary's absence. This either requires us to pay overtime or grant compensatory <br />time or leaves the office short of staff during the day if we just reassign someone to work part of <br />their normal hours during the evening. <br /> <br />3. The detail of Council meeting minutes could be curtailed so that writing the minutes <br />takes less time. <br /> <br /> <br />