Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Watson, Brauer, <br />Shepherd, and Van Scoy. Voting No: None. Absent. None. <br /> <br />Case #10 <br /> <br />Request for Site Plan Review of Cabinetry Concepts, Inc., Case of Robert <br />and Sandra Paddock <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler advised that Robert and Sandra Paddock are proposing to construct a <br />10,976 square foot cabinetry manufacturing facility on the property generally located on Azurite <br />Street at Highway 116 and Sunfish Lake Boulevard. The subject property is zoned E-l, and <br />cabinetry manufacturing facilities are a permitted use in this district. She indicated the lot in <br />question is approximately 1.4 acres. The proposed site plan meets the required front, rear and <br />side yard setbacks. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler explained that the proposed structure appears to meet architectural <br />standards for finish materials. She indicated the proposed grading plan is acceptable, and a <br />revised landscaping plan will be required, showing additional plantings. She noted Staff has <br />similar landscape concerns as with the last case, and would recommend Staff work with the <br />applicant on this one as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if the applicant has any concerns with the Staff Review Letter <br />besides the landscaping. <br /> <br />Ron Paddock stated he has the same concerns that the landscaping is excessive for an industrial <br />project. He indicated he feels the storm water fee is a little high, but he understands that is part <br />of the program and he accepts it. He stated the other things mentioned can be taken care of <br />easily. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Shepherd to recommend that the <br />City Council grant approval of the proposed site plan for construction of a cabinetry <br />manufacturing facility contingent upon compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated August <br />29, 2003 with the exception of the landscaping requirements, with direction to Staff to negotiate <br />those requirements with the applicant. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Shepherd, Brauer, Van <br />Scoy and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Case #11 <br /> <br />Request for Site Plan Review of Riverview Office Suites; Case of Warren <br />Hokanson and Russell Olsen <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler advised Warren Hokanson and Russell Olsen are proposing to <br />construct a 10,097 square foot multi-tenant office building on the property generally located on <br />Riverdale Drive at Alpaca Street. She noted that while site plans do not require a public hearing, <br />notice of the site plan was sent to property owners within 350 feet of the site due to its adjacency <br />to a residential area. She indicated there will be a 50 foot buffer zone, with additional plantings <br />required. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/September 4, 2003 <br /> Page 14 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />