My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/08/1997
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1997
>
Agenda - Council - 07/08/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 4:17:23 PM
Creation date
9/22/2003 10:04:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/08/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Subd. 2. permissive Den. iai. The City may deny a Permit in order to protect the public <br />health, safety and welfare, to prevent interference with the safety and convenience of ordinary <br />travel over the Right-of-Way, or when necessary to protect the Right-of-Way and its users. The <br />City may consider one or more of the following factors: <br /> <br />(a) <br /> <br />the extent to which Right-of-Way space where the Permit is sought is <br />available; <br /> <br />(b) the competing demands for the particular space in the Right-of-Way; <br /> <br />(c) <br /> <br />the availability of other locations in the Right-of-Way or in other Rights- <br />of-Way for the Equipment of the Permit Applicant; <br /> <br />(d) <br /> <br />the applicability of ordinance or other regulations of the Right-of-Way that <br />affect location of Equipment in the Right-of-Way; <br /> <br />(e) <br /> <br />the degree of compliance of the Applicant with the terms and conditions of <br />its franchise, if any, this Chapter, and other applicable ordinances and <br />regulations; <br /> <br />(f) <br /> <br />the degree of disruption to surrounding communities and businesses that <br />will result from the use of that part of the Right-of-Way; <br /> <br />(g) <br /> <br />the condition and age of the Right-of-Way, and whether and when it is <br />scheduled for total or partial reconstruction; and <br /> <br />Ch) <br /> <br />the balancing of the costs of disruption to the public and damage to the <br />Right-of-Way, against the benefits to that part of the public served by the <br />expansion into additional parts of the Right-of-Way. <br /> <br />Subd. 3. Discretionary [ssuance. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sec, 1.18, Subd. <br />and (d) above, the City may issue an Permit in any case where the Permit is necessary (a) to <br />prevent substantial economic hardship to a customer of the Permit Applicant, or Co) to allow such <br />customer to mater/ally improve its Utility Service, or (c) to allow a new economic development <br />project; and where the Permit Applicant did not have knowledge of the hardship, the plans for <br />improvement of Service, or the development project when said Applicant was required to submit <br />its list of Ne,vt-year Projects. <br /> <br />Subd. 4. Permits for Additional Next-year Projects. Notwithstanding the provisions of <br />Section 1.18, Subd. l(c) above, the City may issue a Permit to a Registrant who was allowed <br />under Section 1.08, Sub& 2 to submit an additional Next-year Project,. or in the event the <br />Registrant demonstrates that it used commercially reasonable efforts to anticipate and plan for <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.