Laserfiche WebLink
IG.-19'97(TUE) 11:$5 *'*,~*'*********'** TEL:612 421 9511 P, O06 <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Ch~drperson Bawden; Commissioners Deemer, Jensen, La_Due and <br />Terry. Voting no: None. Absent: Commissioners Holland and Thorud. <br /> <br />Case #5: Request for A Conditional Use Permit To Grade and Export Soils' Case <br /> of North Fork, Inc. <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik explained that thc permit application is for approval of the work to bc <br />done on four sites'in Northfork. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jensen asked where the 35,000 yards of material from the Itasca Shores project area <br />would be taken. <br /> <br />Mr. Peck responded that there are two alternatives. It may be moved off-site, or it may be possible <br />to work out an agreement with the City regarding the development south of 153rd Street. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer, seconded by Commissioner Jensen to amend and adopt the <br />findings of fact in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Motion can/ed. Voting yes: Chairperson Bawderg Commissioners Deemer, Jensen, LaDue and <br />Terry. Voting no: None. Absent: Commissioners Holland and Thorud. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer, seconded by Commissioner Terry to recommend that the City <br />Council issue the conditional use permit as proposed. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Chairperson Bawden; Commissioners Deemer, Terry, Jensen and <br />LaDue. Votingno: None. Absent: Commissioners Holland and Thomd. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request for A Conditional Use Permit for A Personal Communication <br />Service Tower; Case of American Portable Telecom (APT) <br /> <br />In response to the issue of landscaping raised in the public hearing, Planning Intern Skoog stated that <br />the planned red cedar trees must be at least 5 feet in height to comply with the City Code. Also, there <br />is a rninSmum 35-foot setback in the B-1 Business District from a residential boundary. The proposed <br />site is 20 feet from the residential boundary, and the proposed tower is an additional 10 feet away. <br />Therefore, the tower must be shifted another 5 feet to the east. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer noted that mother phase of shopping center development is being planned in <br />that location. He asked how this tower would impact it. <br /> <br />Zoning. Administrator Frolik stated that the property owner has not indicated a conflict with the <br />tower. <br /> <br />Planning Intern Skoog stated that Rum River Plaza was originally to be developed on one parcel <br />However, there were spacing problems w/th the septic system and the smaller residential pared to <br />the south was acquired but never rezoned to commercial. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/August 5, 1997 <br /> Page 6 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />