Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~0~_ CASE #: <br /> <br />1997 EXEMPT WAGES - PAY FOR PERFORMANCE <br /> by Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator <br /> <br />Background: <br />The general practice of wage determinations at the City of Ramsey has been to settle the <br />contracts for the organized groups and then to grant wages to exempt personnel with a <br />parity relationship to the unions. The two unions are LELS which represents police <br />patrol, and AFSCME which represents maintenance, clerical and technical <br />employees. <br /> <br />The positions currently classified as exempt for 1997 include: <br /> City Administrator, <br /> Police Chief, <br /> Finance Director, <br /> CityEngineer, <br /> Administrative Services Manager, <br /> Police Sergeants (2), <br /> Public Works Supervisors (2), <br /> Senior Accountant, <br /> Deputy City Clerk. <br /> <br />At the time wages for 1997 were being considered, the current sergeants and police chief <br />had not yet been appointed. Further, as part of those promotional opportunities it was <br />understood that wages for sergeants and police chief would not be reconsidered during <br />1997 for 1997. <br /> <br />On September 9, 1996, Council granted 1996 and 1997 wage improvements to the <br />exempt positions. As a result of wide disparity on the Council regarding compensation <br />goals for this group, the process was ultimately settled by an "across the board" increase <br />of 3%. In addition, Council set aside an additional 2% of exempt payroll for performance <br />based pay. The direction from Council was that exempt personnel would work out a <br />concensus merit system for presentation to Council (after which further refinement was <br />expected to occur). '-' <br /> <br />I felt the above compromise' t~eld great promise in that it removed the City Administrator <br />from the development of the process. It was set up with those persons subject to the <br />merit system building and recommending that system to Council without participation <br />from me with any inherent bias that I might bring to that table. Ultimately, however, the <br />participants in the discussion were not able to agree on a pay-for-performance plan. The <br />concerns of the group are summarized in the attached memo. <br /> <br /> <br />