Laserfiche WebLink
As with ail other plats, the development agreement will require the planting of one 2-inch <br />ttiamctcr tree for each of the twelve units, in addition to the landscaped berm. Ms. Frolik <br />state~d that a revised gra~g and drainage plan has been submitted that roms vAth the City <br />Engineer's approval and also provides for a seA~mentation basin and m'~ erosion control <br />plan. Th~ developer has also submitted septic system design plans that have been reviewed <br />by the City Engineer and the Building Official. Minor mod.ification~, recommended by <br />Staff, are b~tg incorporated. Ms. Frolik stated that th.is has been fgrwarded to the City <br />Attorney for h~ legal opinion, <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated there is a question about the exi.q~ing easements and this <br />approval should be chsntingent upon City Attorney review, lrle did not see this as a <br />significant pmblerm <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor OilbertsCm and seconded by Counc!lm.~mber Beyer to approve the <br />preliminary plat for Townho~es of Rum River HiLls c~,ntingent upon City Attorney <br />review. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmembev Veterson inquired of the residents (Ralph's) in the <br />audience if they had gotten their questions answered. 'lhey replied they did as they had met <br />with Mr. Dom when he arrived, prior to Council dis,.;ussing this case. <br /> <br />Motion can'ied. Voting Yes: Mayor Gilbertso,~., Councilmembers Beyer, Hardin, Peterson <br />and Zlmmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #15: Report from Road and 'BCl'dge rCommittee <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that tho"Road and ]~dge Cornm~ttee met em'Her and <br />discussed the sweet maintenance pmgr0~ City Staff had an opportunity to do pavement <br />ratings and identif3, candidate projects aver the next three ye, ars. He requested also to raise <br />the overhead fees by two percent. <br /> <br />Motion by Counc~lmember Zimmerma~ and seconded by Court.member Hardin to direct <br />that the City Engineer prepare a .~asibility study for the 1995 Street.Maintenance Program. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Zimmerman stated his motion intevt was to include the <br />2% overhead increase. CouncLlmember Peterson questioned what {f six streets in a <br />subdi,As~on need maintenuace and two do not. lie stated that sometimes a subclivis~on is <br />divided into two project* t>e. cause some streets do not need the overlay, etc: He inquLred at <br />what point could it become a separate project. Mr. Jankowski stated that if tlttre is a logical <br />point to break it into ~wo projects, it could be done. Councilmember Peterson inquired if <br />Council would be seeing this proposal again to which Mr. Jankowski replied M' would be <br />bringing the feasi~tlity study to the first Council meeting in January. Coumd!member <br />Peterson then inatdred if CouncLI would be looking at each project to determine LC~t should <br />be two separate projects. Councilmember 7Jmmerrnan stated that each year there's ~t least <br />one subdivisio~ that gets agitated and does not want to get the maintenance done. ~ will <br />have to take that into consideration. <br /> <br />Motion e~.rrie~ Voting Yes: Mayor Gilbertson, Counc{tmembers Zimmerman, I--Iardith <br />Beyer ~d Peterson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Mr, Jankowsld stated that the second issue discussed was the assessment procedure. <br />Council agreed there should be a detailed written policy regarding same. He summarized <br />cae draft policy for Council. <br /> <br />City Council/December 13, 1994 <br /> Paee 15 of 19 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />