My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/07/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/07/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:08:30 AM
Creation date
7/1/2011 1:16:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/07/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review File: Stoney River <br />Sketch Plan and Site Plan Review <br />June 30, 2011 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />Signs: Please note that all signs for the proposed building must be approved through a separate sign <br />permit process. Sign regulations can be found in City Code Chapter 117, Article II, Division 8. The <br />developer is encouraged to review these sign regulations early in the process to avoid any unnecessary <br />delays due to potential needs for special permits. Staff has received a photo of a potential, similar sign <br />proposed to be used. Please provide dimensions of the sign for review. Ground signs are reviewed on the <br />following: <br />• Maximum of 100 square feet per face (200 square feet aggregate) <br />• Maximum of 25 feet tall <br />• Dynamic Display is limited to 35% of the sign face <br />• Off -premise advertising copy must be processed as a Conditional Use Permit <br />• The City has the flexibility to increase these maximums through the issuance of a Conditional use <br />Permit <br />Landscape Review <br />Reviewer: Chris Anderson, Associate Planner/Environmental Coordinator <br />canderson(ai,ci. ramsev. mn. us <br />763-433-9905 <br />Landscaping & Tree Preservation Plans: Required landscaping in the B-1 District is based either on <br />lineal feet of site perimeter or square footage of building footprint, whichever results in more plantings, as <br />well as total number of parking spaces provided. Based on the lineal footage of the site (2,822 feet) and <br />the number of parking stalls provided (66), a total of sixty-two (62) trees are required. Based on the <br />square footage of the proposed building footprint (53,228 sq. ft.), a total of 177 shrubs are required. The <br />Plans indicate a total of fifty-four (54) trees and 104 shrubs to be installed, which, in addition to roughly <br />120 existing trees that will be preserved, satisfy the required number of plantings. The following <br />additional comments are offered regarding the Landscaping and Tree Preservation Plans- <br />• Tree save fencing must be identified on both the grading plan (sheet C3.1) and the landscaping <br />plan (sheet L2.1) and must be installed prior to any land disturbance activities. <br />• The following should be added to the notes section on sheets L2.1 and L2.2: Topsoil, whether <br />imported or amending the existing topsoil, must meet or exceed Mn/DOT's Premium Topsoil <br />specification (3877.3). The City has a list of `pre -certified' suppliers that have submitted test <br />results verifying the material meets this specification. If you opt to use an alternative supplier, or <br />if amending onsite topsoil, documentation must be supplied to the City verifying that the material <br />meets Mn/DOT's Premium Topsoil Borrow specification. A copy of the load tickets will also be <br />required to pass the topsoil inspection. <br />• The Plans indicate various areas will be seeded rather than improved with sod. All areas not <br />otherwise improved shall be fmished with sod. Any deviation from this condition requires City <br />Council approval. <br />• Any disturbed areas of right-of-way shall be restored to County and Mn/DOT standards, <br />whichever may be applicable. <br />• Should City Council approve the use of seed rather than sod, details must be added to sheets L2.1 <br />and L2.2 outlining application rate(s) and installation method. <br />• Please review and resolve any conflicts that may exist between the landscaping and <br />grading/utility plans such that no trees, bushes, etc. are not being placed in emergency overflow <br />areas obstructing flow, or are located on top of permanent infrastructure items (manholes, <br />cleanouts, etc.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.