My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
01/08/97
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agendas
>
1997
>
01/08/97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2025 3:20:47 PM
Creation date
9/23/2003 9:28:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Economic Development Commission
Document Date
01/08/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Green commented that it appears this amendment passed by the voters includes all but two <br />people. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich disagreed. It applies to alt people who have a functional septic system and sell. <br />Each person in that circumstance can take advantage of that. <br /> <br />Jim Green stated that if we would have known there would be an amendment, we would not have <br />signed this development agreement. How could we know you would change this. You left us <br />hanging with nowhere to go. You changed something after you signed it. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich suggested that Mr. Green had received the benefit he bargained for, <br /> <br />Mr. Green stated that if the amendment is good for the Olsons, it's good for the Greens and the <br />Juskiewiczs also. This was brought to light after we signed the agreement. That cannot be legal. <br /> <br />Mr. Olson stated that this entire project has been a real mess from the get-go. There have been a lot <br />of battles with City Hall, Mr. Schroeder, Mr. Jankowski and City Council. He felt bad about <br />these battles and about the wedges between the neighbors on his block. The intent when we went <br />forward with the Charter amendment was not to disclude anyone. It was to include all parties that <br />meet requirements. We did not go forward with this to "get" anybody. He reiterated how badly he <br />felt about the wedges and wished they could be resolved. He stated it was nothing personal and <br />that he appreciated Council's patience through this whole deal. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to close the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beahen, Beyer and <br />Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 8:03 <br /> <br />Council Bo.si_ness <br /> <br />Mayor Hardin called the regular portion of the City Council meeting back to order at 8:03 p.m. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to adopt Resolution <br />g96-10-302 adopting assessment for Improvement Project 4495-14 (Municipal sanitary sewer, <br />watermain, storm sewer, and street improvements to Haubrich Addition). This resolution is <br />amended to defer and exclude Olson/Schmidt, Haubrich, and Croteau properties. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Mr. Schroeder stated that because of this action, this project fund is left with a <br />deficit. The public improvement revolving fund will.subsidize it. We intend to come back with <br />ideas on how to make that project fund whole. <br /> <br />Case #14: <br /> <br />Public Hearing and Levying of Assessments for Improvement Project <br />#95-16 Bituminous Paving of Bison Street from 171st Avenue to <br />County Road #63 <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that Improvement Project #95-16 has been completed and final <br />costs associated with the project have been tabulated. The City agreed to pick up the cost of <br />relocating Bison Street for $4,500 which turned out to be #7,500. There were some other cost <br />differences. The net result is proposed to be assessed to six benefited property owners. Two <br />would be paid for by escrow provided by the Dellwood Hills. The new numbers are $5,458 <br />which is an increase of $521 over what was anticipated in the feasibility study. <br /> <br />City Council/October 8, 1996 <br /> Page 18 of 26 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.