My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/1997
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1997
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 12:52:05 PM
Creation date
9/23/2003 9:48:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/09/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Grooming of a trail would be done with a snowmobile pulling a grooming apparatus ax a speed of <br />approximately six to eight miles per hour. TidB is a four-foot width grooming model which is <br />comprised ora series of combs which scrape and pack the snow. It can also be equipped with a track <br />setter. The model also uses a retractable blade in the front. For larger amounts of snow fall a roller <br />could be used to compact the snow for groon'dag completion by the TidB. It was noted the TidB <br />promotes safety and assists in trial preparation duri~ the non-winter season. Cost of grooming <br />equipment is estimated at $1,500 ($500.00 for the TidB and $1,000 for a snowmobile). <br /> <br />Positioning of interpretive signs which would provide directions, information, and assist in safety <br />measures is recommended. <br /> <br />Education (Tracie Wahlberg) <br />Study of vegetation, wildlkC-e identification, and water studies (stream and water quality analyses) are <br />three different types of studies which could be conducted at the Park. This could assist in conjmaction <br />with errviromnental ]earning canter, but would not necessarily require construction of a building; <br />simply access to the area. <br /> <br />There are schools in the Anoka-Hennepin School District which could potentially use the area. <br />Currently, there are four schools which have expressed interest in utilizing the area. As well, there <br />are other groups (i.e. scouting and community organizations) which could use the area. <br /> <br />Public Opinior~ (Valerie Malmquist) <br />There were two approaches used to gather public input about development of the proposed area: <br />public questionnaire; and distribution of a survey to Anoka High School students. Questionnaire and <br />survey responses were favorable for non-motorized trail development. It was noted accompanying <br />issues were examhaed one of which would be an increase in real estate values for those residents <br />located by near the trail, <br /> <br />Surmnmy. (Valerie Malmquist) <br />Public response indicates residents desire a trail which is located in a east/west direction. <br /> <br />Questions Posed to Presenters <br />In response to the City Adrrfinistrator, the sample size (people surveyed) results show that 389 or <br />79% favor a trail, 67 or 14% oppose a trail, and 39 or 7% are undecided. <br /> <br />Chairperson Cook referred to the heightened phosphorus levels md inquired whether this was due <br />in part to runoff from fertilizers applied to lawns from area residents. Mitch Allen was unable to <br />provide a concrete conclusior~ He recommended taking additional water samples at different seasons <br />in the three areas where samples were previously retrieved. <br /> <br />Ms. Malmquist expressed her appreciation to everyone present. <br /> <br />~Park and Recreation Commission/December 12, 1996 <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.