My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/23/1996
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1996
>
Agenda - Council - 04/23/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 3:30:44 PM
Creation date
9/23/2003 2:04:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/23/1996
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />reading is dispensed with bv unanimous consent of the council and shall <br />be f~ed and preserved by t~e clerk-administrator. <br /> <br />Commissioner Heitman stated that this change was initiated by Councilmember <br />Cox's concern in that he feels it should take a majority vote to get a <br />resolution read rather than a unanimous consensus to dispense with the reading. <br /> <br />Chairperson Sieber arrived at this time. <br /> <br />Chainvan Sieber stated that he would like to see a provision in the Charter <br />that would give one councilperson the right to call for a reading of a <br />resolution. <br /> <br />Commissioner Heitman stated that Chairman Sieber's suggestion would create the <br />same situation that currently exists; one person can force the reading of a <br />resolution; there is the potential to delay the flow of council meetings just <br />as much as. <br /> <br />Chainuan Seiber stated that it seems unreasonable to vote on and pass an <br />amendment and not include any recourse for anybody to have a resolution read. <br /> <br />Commissioner Heitman stated that with the current procedure, a resident still <br />has to ~r~ a councilperson to take action to have a resolution read. <br /> <br />Councilmember Arnie Cox was present and stated that his concern is not as <br />Commissioner Heitman indicated. Councilmember COx stated that he has no <br />problem with having the opportunity to have a resolution read - it doesn't mean <br />that the sa~e situation will be created. It is very difficult to conduct a <br />council meeting while trying to keep case thoughts in order, especially when <br />thoughts have to be interrupted to attend to a procedural matter like waiving <br />the reading, of the resolutions. As for the public, they have always had the <br />right to have a resolution clarified or read. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hei~uan stated that if a provision is included in the charter to <br />allc~ one person to call for a reading, the first time Councilmember Cox <br />chooses to invoke that right, the flow of the meeting will be slowed down just <br />as much as it is now. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox reminded Commissioner Heitman that he sits through the same <br />meetings and the number one priority is community business. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman stated that City Staff is collecting a salary for attending those <br />Council meetings and Councilm~mber Cox wastes the evenings away. <br /> <br />Councilmember Reimann was present and stated that reading of resolutions is a <br />waste of ~; a councilperson should arrive at the meeting prepared and ready <br />to take action. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bauerkemper asked Councilmember Reimann if he would prefer it to <br />take a majority to have a resolution read or a minority to have it read. <br /> <br />Counci~r Reimann replied that the majority should rule. <br /> <br />May 30, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.