My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/09/1996
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1996
>
Agenda - Council - 09/09/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 3:35:08 PM
Creation date
9/24/2003 11:22:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/09/1996
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPEED WATCH <br /> <br />CHAPTER. <br /> <br /> The Neighborhood Speed Watch Program, <br /> which borrows some of the Neighborhood <br /> Crime Watch concepts, relies on neighborhood <br /> participation to create awareness and thus <br /> help control speeds in neighborhoods. A per- <br /> sonal letter may be sent to local residents as- <br /> king for their cooperation and personal visits <br /> by neighborhood committee members may in- <br /> clude an appeal for cooperation if a self con~ <br /> rained subdivision is involved. Signs may be <br /> erected. Radar observations by transportation <br /> personnel or neighborhood residents trained <br /> in the use of a radar unit are then made. One <br /> runs the unit and one records vehicle and <br /> speed information. Speeders are sent letters <br /> by the Traffic or Police Department pointing <br /> out the inconsistent speeds relative to stand- <br /> ards adopted by their friends and neighbors. <br /> In many cases, the speeders turn out to be local <br /> residents. When neighborhood residents run <br /> the unit, they learn first hand about the prob- <br /> lem or lack thereof. This technique could be a <br /> part Of a low cost initial phase attem, pt to slow <br /> speeders. Later phases could involve physical <br /> design or other changes if this technique fails <br /> to produce lasting speed reductions.. <br /> <br /> Effects <br /> <br />Volumes. Essentially no change since traffic is <br />13cal. <br /> <br />Speed. In two Georgia subdivisions, 85th per- <br />centile speeds were reduced from 45 to 35 mph <br />and the total number of vehicles exceeding 50 <br />mph was reduced from 56 to 13 vehicles daffy. <br /> <br />Neighborhood Traffic Control <br /> <br />January 1994 <br /> <br /> ! <br /> ! <br /> In others, the speed reductions were evider' <br /> not significant. Speed..s..I' .typically go do,' <br /> during the watch, but may not remain <br /> later. Data is needed. <br /> <br /> Traffic Noise, Air Quality and Energy <br /> sumption. Little or no effect. <br /> <br /> Traffic Safety. Possibility of improved safet~ <br />through reduced speed. <br /> ! <br />Commurdty Reactiom This program has been,, <br />perceived positively by the neighborhoods1 <br />even in areas where significant speed reduc- <br />tions were not meastzrable. Residential spe1 <br />complaints virtually ceased in the Geor <br />case. In many cases, the neighborhood re,~ <br />dents may find that no significant proble: <br />exis ts. <br /> Cos~ I <br />This technique can typically be fairly low ii,, <br />cost requ/rflag a radar gun and some da <br />15rocessing and training (staff time). <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.