Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN <br />OFF-SITE ADVERTISING SIGN; <br /> CASE OF HOLM'S SUPER BOWL, INC. <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Tim Holm of~ Holm's Super Bowl, Inc. is the new owner of the Super Bowl facility. Since <br />taking owneiship of the business, he has learned from City Staff that each commercial <br />parcel is alloiwed one free-standing sign not to exceed 100 square feet in size and Code also <br />restricts signa to identifying the business or service offered at the parcel on which the sign <br />is located, lv!.;r~. Holm has stated he feels he is in a unique situation being located one block <br />off the highway and the lack of identification of the bowling alley on Highway 4/10 has an <br />adverse impact on his business. Therefore, he has submitted an application for a <br />conditional use permit for an off-site advertising sign that would be placed on the Dubats <br />property at 6'/40 Hwy. #10. <br /> <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) <br />b) <br />c) <br /> <br />d) <br />e) <br /> <br />Site location map <br />Proposed sign <br />Draft Planning Commission public hearing and regular meeting minutes <br />dated September 3, 1996 <br />Proposed findings of fact <br />Proposed conditional use permit <br /> <br />Notification: <br /> <br />In accordance with State law, properties within 350 feet of the subject property were <br />notified of the!public hearing pertaining to the request. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The previous !owner of Super Bowl had a lawful non-conforming ('grandfathered') <br />identification sign on the Dubats property and for various reasons, removed it knowing full <br />well that undei the new regulations it could not be replaced without obtaining a conditional <br />use permit from the City. <br /> <br />Since removal of the sign, Mr. Holm purchased the Super Bowl facility and he feels lack of <br />identification cin the highway has hurt the business. He would like a conditional use permit <br />to replace the 96 square foot sign in its previous location on the Dubats property. <br /> <br />The Dubats property already has an 84 square foot lawful conforming sign on Hwy #10 <br />and a 24 squa.ve foot lawful non-conforming sign on Riverdale Drive N.W. Approval of <br />Mr. Holm's request would result in 3 free-standing signs on the parcel totaling 180 square <br />feet of sign sp/tce (Code permits 1 at 100 square feet.). There are numerous businesses <br />that would like to be identified on Hwy. #10 and approval of Mr. Holm's request would <br />set a precedent, <br /> <br /> <br />