Agenda - Council - 10/08/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW; CASE OF SHOREWOOD R.V. By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik Background: Mr. Jon Menke~f Shorewood R.V. has applied for site plan reivew to construct and operate a full service recreatignal vehicle center on the south side of Hwy. gl0 at its intersection with Llama Street. The following items are enclosed for your infoh~nation: a) b) c) d) e) ite location map ' itc plan ' Oty Staff Review Letter dated September 26, 1996 Draft Planning Commission meeting minutes dated October 1, 1996 l~oposed development permit Notification: Site plans are not required to be subjected to public hearings. Observations: The development includes a 27,115 square foot building for some indoor display area, sales offices, and mai~htenance shop area. It is proposed that the site. will be developed in phases and Lots 1 and 2 woald make up the fa'st phase. The development permit has been drafted to prohibit any expansion o~e r.v. or used car display areas onto Lot 3 without pavement and curbing being in place.. The f.a~c.ility will be served, by .an on-site well and the site plan reflects that the septic system will be d~slgned by a cemfied designer. The site plan proposes access to be from 3 locations on Riverdale Drive N.W. and one egress onto Llama Street; no,direct access onto Hwy. #10 is proposed. The proposed d~.¥elopment is in compliance with City Code as far as lot coverage, landscaping, waste storage, a~nd setbacks. However, there is a future building expansion proposed on the south side of the ~tructure. This expansion as proposed will encroach on the 35 foot setback from the south property line by 5 feet. The site plan is being revised to relocate the structure 5 feet north to allow for the future expansion within required setbacks. The proposed structure also meets [ architectural starldards as the exterior walls are proposed to be pre-cast concrete panels. There is also a roof-top grojecuon of a r.v. that is proposed to also consist of pre-cast concrete. The Planning Commigsion has recommended that this roofline projection be viewed as an integral part of the structure a~ld not as signage. (City Code prohibits roof signs). The site plan is also being modified to clearly identify the proposed phases of the development project and that M1 display and parking areas will be. surfaced with bituminous and finished with B- 612 concrete curbing. City Code would require 21 customer/employee parking spaces for the 179 r.v.'s and 30 cars estimated to be displayed on the site. It also requires 24 parking spaces for the 8 maintenance bays in the building. Therefore, Code requires 45 parking spaces and 49 are provided. The City Engineer has recommended some modifications to the drainage plan which is in process. t77