My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/22/1996
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1996
>
Agenda - Council - 10/22/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 3:37:17 PM
Creation date
9/24/2003 2:44:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/22/1996
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />:1 <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Vose informed the Commission that Continental and U.S. West have <br />entered into an agreement to merge. A FCC form 394 has been filed in <br />that respect by U.S. West. <br /> <br />Vose stated that it was originally believed that all of Continental's <br />assets would be merges with U.S. West, Inc., however, after asking <br />questions, it has been learned that U.S. West Media Group, Inc. will be <br />merging with Continental. A new entity that has not yet been <br />incorporated will be merging and taking all of Continental's assets. <br /> <br />Vose reminded Commission members that this information is very <br />important because what ever entity ends up with all of the property is <br />usually the entity that will be responsible for performance obligations <br />or to look to if the Commission was needing to sue and also to fulfill <br />the obligations of the franchise. <br /> <br />This problems brought about the importance of the corporate <br />guarantee. Clearly U.S. West is legally, financially, and technically <br />qualified to operate the franchise. <br /> <br />Mr. Vose and Mr. Creighton's recommendation is to move forward <br />with resolution to each member city to approve the <br />Continental/U.S.West transaction as well. <br /> <br />Donald Jacobson stated that he believes that there should be some kind <br />of a time frame for the transaction to be completed and that if they can <br />not complete it in this time frame they need to come back to the <br />Commission and ask for a extension or the deal is null and void. <br /> <br />Vose informed the Commission that U.S. West recently requested of <br />the FCC that a waiver of an existing Federal Law which is part of the <br />Federal Cable Act which prevents telephone companies from <br />purchasing a cable system with in their own telephone service area. <br />U.S.West is asking that the FCC waive this provision for 18 months. <br /> <br />The new Federal Law clearly sets out criteria for the FCC to follow on <br />g.ranting these waivers. One being, the requesting company has to get <br />approval of the local franchise authority. U.S. West is filing a petition <br />s~ating that the statue does not clearly state that they need to get the <br />local Franchise Authorities' authorization. There has been a <br />opposition filed by the Commission's attorneys regarding getting a <br />waiver "with out" permission. <br /> <br />Mark Nagel voiced his concerns that he has with U.S. West and their <br />"corporate character". In the past Nagel feels that when ever a problem <br />arises involving the city they go straight to the legal matters instead of <br />trying to sit done and work it out. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.