Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> <br />:1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br />:1 <br /> <br />5. Bituminous pavement is trimmed with a five foot wide area of landscape rock in <br />accordance with a Development Agreement of 1986. <br />6. Bituminous pavement is trimmed with a ten foot wide area of landscape rock in <br />accordance with a Development Agreement of 1988. <br /> <br />(b) Technical. The layout of these phases in 1986 and 1988 was designed to reduce storm <br />water runoff'int, o the Ebony St./1Liverside West storm sewer system, through the use of landscape <br />rock over sand.' The installation orB 6-12 curbing would require that, either the driveway level <br />be lowered applroximately six inches, or that the lawn level be raised six inches. This raised curb <br />would interfere,~with snow removal operations, and increase water runoff`into the Ebony St. <br />storm sewer. Alternately, the use of a flat curb would still require that the existing pavement be <br />sawed back for forming, the bituminous pavement patched and the landscaping restored. This <br />approach would not interfere with the present "sheeting off" of rainfall or snow plowing, but <br />would still be a ~airly expensive process. The mismatched pavement patching would not be <br />especially aesthetically pleasing. The net effect upon appearance would be negative. <br /> <br />(c) Legal. Th~ existing layout of buildings, pavement, curbing and landscaping for subject <br />properties are sl~elled out in various Development Agreements between the undersigned and the <br />City of Ramsey.; The City has consistently contended and maintained that such Agreements are <br />binding, legal c0.ntracts. The content of 9.20.23 Subd. 4 as well as the text of Reference (A) <br />appears to suggest that said Agreements are not binding contracts after all, inasmuch as the City <br />now seeks to urfilaterally abrogate many of those agreements under the guise of a change in City <br />Code. We recotnmend that the City consider the far reaching implications of the wholesale <br />breaching ofsuah agreements, which are signed by the parties and notarized. <br /> <br />In summary, retrofitting of concrete curb to subject properties would be expensive, and would not <br />significantly aff'~t the function of improvements to the properties. Any adverse action by the City <br />to compel such ¢hanges may constitute a breech of contract. The estimated cost of removing and <br />reinstalling 460 t~eet of fence, sawing and patching 1,090 lineal feet of pavement and installing <br />1,090 lineal feet [of flat concrete curb is approximately $17,200. Alternately, the undersigned <br />would not object to implementing any changes desired by the City through the use of public <br />funds. We desire to reach an explicit agreement with the City on this matter at an early date. <br /> <br />Please feel free to contact the undersigned at 757-7324 or FAX 757-3079 if questions concerning <br />the foregoing should arise. <br /> <br />Thanking you in advance, <br /> <br />William C. Dubats <br />President, Anoka Self Storage, LLC <br /> <br />Ramsey Development Agreements P. 2 of 2. <br /> <br /> <br />