Laserfiche WebLink
SCOPE & INTI!_ODUCTION <br /> <br />The purpose of th!s study is to determine the feasibility and associated costs for providing a <br />bituminous street ti) serve the segment of Bison Street N.W. between County Road #63 (173rd <br />Avenue N.W.) and!the north line of the Trott Brook Ridge subdivision. Project #92-20 involved <br />the proposed pavit~g of Bison Street between County Road #63 and 171st Avenue N.W. This <br />project was initiat~ by a petition signed by 35% of the affected property owners. The City <br />Council by four fif!hs majority vote, created Project ~92-23, which was to address the paving of <br />Bison Street south of 171st Avenue N.W. <br /> <br />Public hearings were initiated on both these projects on February 6, 1993. The public hearing on <br />Project ~92-20 was closed on February 6, 1993. However, the public hearing on Project #92-23 <br />was continued oniFebruary 16, 1993 and March 9, 1993 as a result of considerable public <br />comment and Cit~ Council directives. The original feasibility study, dated January 1993, was <br />revised on February 16, 1993 and February 26, 1993 as a result of City Council directives. At the <br />March 9, 1993 CiW Council meeting, the public hearing on Project ~92-23 was closed. The <br />Council was not al~le to come to a consensus on the specific nature of the improvement associated <br />with Project #92-~ and, no further consideration will be given to this project until such time as <br />another project mil~ht be initiated pursuant to City ordinances and policies for such improvements. <br />This feasibility std, dy has been revised to identify the remaining Project #92-20 as it has been <br />accepted by City -~ouncil. The project lies within the Northwest Quarter of Section 9 and the <br />benefitted parcels ~e identified in Appendix A. <br /> <br />EXISTIN(3 CO _NDITIONS <br />The present street ~onsists of a rural street section with a gravel and sand surface approximately 21 - <br />26 feet in width. 'i'he depth of the gravel surface was found to be between zero to three inches. <br />The history of the ~oad right-of-way is somewhat involved. In 1966, the roadway was intended to <br />run along the corninon border of two properties which occupied the entire north/south distance <br />between County R~ad #63 and the half section line of Section 9. At that time, each property owner <br />conveyed an easer~ent to the other for access purposes from"County Road #63 to the half section <br />line of Section 9. As parcels were created from these original two, the City began maintaining the <br />existing roadway. ~ Since no formal deed was given to the City, its fight-of-way claim is based <br />upon State Statute ~160.05(1) which deems streets to be public after six years of maintenance. The <br />City thus has a el '.agra of two rods (or 33 feet) from the centerline of actual use. Nonetheless, both <br />Anderson Estates ~d Dellwood Hills subdivisions have subsequently dedicated 33 feet of right-of- <br />way along thc boundary between thc original two properties which initially established the road. <br />In addition, the Ci~ entered into a stipulation in June 1982 with Leonard and Lorraine Hinton, the <br />property owners, ag that time, of parcels one and two to place the roadway in its originally intended <br />location when it b~ame paved. The actual location of the roadway lies as much as 25 feet outside <br />the intended right-Of-way at County Road #63 and returns within the intended fight-of-way by the <br />time it reaches the intersection with 171st Avenue N.W. <br /> <br />PROPOSED IM~PROVEMENT$ <br />It is proposed to r~grade to return the roadway to the cente, r of its intended fight-of-way north of <br />171st Avenue N._W? It is proposed to provide a 24 foot wide. bituminous roadway with a four foot <br />gravel shoulder ar;d a two foot deep drainage ditch on each' side. While this does not meet the <br />suburban standardbf a 30 foot roadway with a bituminous curb, it does provide a minimum cost <br />solution to pavinglthis street and it is consistent with the road'-section in adjacent Golden Eagle <br />Estates. It also eliminates the need for obtaining a drainage easement which would be required if <br />the drainage were tO be concentrated by curbline and discharged at specific locations. <br /> <br /> <br />