Agenda - Council - 04/25/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

NOTE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES The Planning Commission noted the following City Council meeting minutes: 1) City Council public hearing and regular meeting minutes dated February 14, 1995. 2) :City Council regular meeting minutes dated February 28, 1995. 3) City Council regular meeting minutes dated March 14, 1995. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairperson Bawden adjourned the regular Planning Commission meeting at 7:35 p.m. in order to conduct the following public hearings: 1) Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Group Foster Care Home; Case of Patrick McLafferty (reconvening) 2) Request to Rezone Certain Property from B-1 Business to B-2 Business; Case of Polka Dot Dairy and Wayne Johnson, Rum River Properties 3) ~Request to Rezone Certain Property from B-3 Highway Business to R-1 Urban ~Residential; Case of Super Bowl, Inc. and Fitzsimonds Builders, Inc. 4) !:Request for Preliminary Plat Approval of Fox Knoll; Case of Rick Murray, Residential ~Development Company, and Mark Kteckner, Fox Development Co. ? Chairperson Bawden called the regular Planning Commission meeting back to order at 8:50 p.m. COMMISSION BUSINESS Case #1: Request for Conditional Use Permit for a Group Foster Care Home; ~ Case of Patrick McLafferty ? Zoning Administrator Frolik recounted that when the March Planning Commission meeting was called ~o order, Mr. McLafferty insisted that the public hearing be opened despite City Attorney Goodrichfs advice to re.~ect the application. Hence, the Planning Commission conducted the public hearing which was reconvened and adjourned earlier tonight. Therefore, it is Mr. Goodrich's advice:that because the public hearing was conducted, it in effect initiated the conditional use permit (CUP,process, and based on that, he advises the Planning Commission to continue considering this matter from a zoning perspective, adopt findings of fact, and make their recommendation to the City COuncil. Mr. Gerry Randall, of Randalt, Dehn & Goodrich, suggested that the Commission consider amending the findings of fact to reflect that permitting this use is not in harmony with the City Comprehensive Plan. The planning Commission proceeded to review the findings of fact. It waste consensus of the Planning Commission to accept #1 through #10 as presented. Planning Commission/April 4, 1995 Page 2 of 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I