My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/23/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1995
>
Agenda - Council - 05/23/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 3:38:05 PM
Creation date
9/26/2003 11:12:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/23/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br />c~TY OF SRVAOE ~ 6~ 42? 5545 <br /> <br />CITY OF SAVAGE <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Mayor and Counciil <br />Mark McNeill <br /> <br />DAT~ <br /> <br />Collector Street Fee <br /> <br />July 24, 1989 <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />m <br /> <br /> Background: <br />! <br /> <br />m <br />I <br />m Recommendation: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Action Required: <br /> <br />COMMENT: <br /> <br /> ThE Council is asked to formally adopt a policy which <br /> st~es that collector street fees apply only to parcels <br /> within the MUSA. <br /> <br /> It ks the city's policy to collect fees for storm <br /> drainage and collector street (development fees based <br /> on ~rea) at the time of platting, or at the time of <br /> bui~lding permit, whichever occurs first.'' <br /> F <br /> In ~racttce, these fees have not been applied to acreages <br /> in ~he rural area, Cost of building permit {for a ten- <br /> ac~ parcel, for instance} would be prohibitively <br /> ex~ensive if all normal development fees were collected <br /> then. <br /> <br /> Thi~ is consistent with Resolution No. R-88-33 which <br /> spOil(es that storm drainage fees shall apply tQ parcels <br /> of)'ecord within the MUSA at time of building permit. A <br /> co~elati'ng resolution in regard to collector street, <br /> hodever, does not include this verbage. <br /> F <br /> TheI question arose last week when permits were requested <br />· fo~ a lot in Oak Knolls and for the Jay Sheehan property <br /> on ~llen Drive. Both are unplatted parcels outside the <br /> Urban Service Area. For the sake of consistency, these <br /> development fees (based on area) were not charged. <br /> We recommend that the Council formalize policY, and add <br /> "to~ lots of record within the MUSA" to policy regarding <br /> collector street. The intent is to collect this fee at the <br /> tim~ of platting, o~ as an assessment at such time that <br /> street is extended. <br /> <br /> If ~he Council concurs, it should adopt the following <br /> resolution: <br /> <br />RES <br /> <br />)LUTION AMENDING/CLARIFYING COLLECTOR STREET FEES <br /> <br /> Mark McNeill <br /> City Administrator <br /> <br />N0.335 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.