Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CASE # <br /> <br /> ~ CONSIDER DRAFT RESIDENT SURVEY <br />By: Beth Malaby, Community Development Intern <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />A group of high scl~ool students from Anoka High School has proposed to create and administer a <br />survey of Ramsey r,&sidents, as part of their community service efforts. As they have proposed it, <br />the concept of the ~u. rvey is to explore residents' vision for Ramsey in 2010. Attached for your <br />review is a draft vermon of the survey. <br /> <br />The students have ggreed to distribute copies of the survey by going door-to,door to Ramsey <br />households. They re requesting funds from the City to pay for return postage for the surveys, <br />and also are requesting that the City make copies of the survey in-house. The students have been <br />working with staff I~o produce a survey document which will provide useful information in terms <br />of planning for Raffisey's future. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The survey is a on{-page questionnaire which can be folded up, taped shut, and dropped in the <br />mail. Postage cost l~er survey would be $0.32. Assuming the survey is distributed to half of the <br />households in Ramgey, and (optimistically) 33% of those households respond, return postage <br />would cost no more !than: <br /> <br />2250 households x 33% x $0.32 ............................................ $240 <br /> <br />An alternative to milling the completed surveys might be the placement of drop boxes at frequented <br />locations (such as gas stations and the grocery store). However, the survey is likely to get a <br />drastically lower response rate using drop boxes. Chances are good that the response rate would <br />not be h!gh enoug$ for the survey to be considered a valid indicator of opinions within the <br />communlty. <br /> <br />Copying the survey in-house would require 4-1/2 reams of legal size paper, at a cost of <br />approximately $24 ~assuming 2250 households are surveyed). <br />It is certainly feasibie to distribute the survey to a smaller sample of households. The total number <br />of surveys receivedl is less important (statistically) than the response rate and a lack of bias in <br />selecting a sample. -.~,~ <br /> <br />ostage and copying costs cou d be absorbed within the existing a~nunis~auve uuugej~,'~.t.the end <br />of the year, any ove~,ages could be cover.ed through reallocation <br /> <br />Recommend Council authorize necessary expenditures t;p to $264 for completion of the Survey. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br />City Administrator . <br />Community DeveloP, ment Intem <br />Finance Officer <br /> <br />FC: 05/23/95 <br /> <br />Copies distributed to: <br />Park Commission <br /> <br /> <br />