Laserfiche WebLink
' the survey in- hduse. She added that the students have been working with staff to produce <br />a survey document which will provide useful information in terms of planning for <br />Ramsey's futurd. <br />' Finance OfficerfHart suggested that postage and copying costs could be absorbed within <br />the existing administrative budget. At the end of the year, any overages could be covered <br />' through reallocation from the contingency fund. <br />Motion by Couricilmember Beyer and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to recommend <br />Council authori* necessary expenditures up to $264 for completion of the survey. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Beyer, Beahen, Peterson <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br />' Case #3: Priority Street Lighting Update <br />15 <br />Finance Officer dart reported that the street lighting map, along with the most recent list of <br />' <br />priorities, has been forwarded to Police Chief Auspos for his review and proposed <br />changes. He w #1 be working with Community Development Intern Kendra Lindahl and <br />the reviewed list of priorities and new cost calculations will be submitted for review and <br />' <br />approval at the Finance Committee meeting on June 27, 1995. <br />No Committee a�don was required. <br />' <br />Case #4: Discussion Regarding Licensing Group Homes <br />Councilmember Peterson questioned if when group homes come into a community, is there <br />prior notificatiori by the State. <br />City Administra#or Schroeder replied he wasn't sure. <br />' <br />Councilmember# Peterson stated he attended the public hearing held by the Planning <br />Commission reg4Wing this and he feels there are several "loose ends ". <br />' <br />Councilmember Vimmerman felt it's best to leave this licensing up to the State. <br />Councilmember`;Peterson agreed, but felt that the State wasn't necessarily doing their job <br />' <br />regulating it. <br />Councilmember 3eyer felt that we do not have enough staff to start dealing with this. <br />' <br />Mr. Schroeder offered to check on the status of the State legislature and report back to the <br />Committee. ` <br />' <br />Case #5: �' of Fox park Budget and Development Plan <br />Community Dev lopment Intern Malaby stated that the 1995 Capital Improvement Program <br />' <br />contains appromately $75,000 for the development of Fox Park. Last summer, a <br />proposed plan w4s prepared but surveys of neighborhood residents' preferences suggested <br />some revisions to plan and budget. The consensus was on preservation of natural <br />environment an play equipment. Therefore, we have tried to emphasize both of these <br />' <br />things so we hiw a decent - sized playground and a lot of things that enhance natural <br />environment. Thee other important facet of the park development plan was tennis/basketball <br />courts, etc. These were fairly controversial in the survey; however, tennis courts were the <br />' <br />Finance Committee /May 23, 1995 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />15 <br />