Agenda - Council - 12/12/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I Mr. Jankowskti stated that this is one of the issues discussed at the Road and Bridge Committee me~ting. The Johnston's have their driveway on the County Road but they have frontage .bn one or more of the residential streets. Our policy has been to assess comer lots a f~ll share when the appropriate frontage received the improvement. In this case, they wo~d never receive an assessment because they are on the County Road. The Road and Brid~.e Committee recommended they should pay a share equal to everyone else in the subdivigion. Councilmemb~r Peterson inquired if this would be dealt with on a case-by-case basis or if we would bec.hanging the policy. Mr. Jankowski stated that in the case where property fronts on residential and MSA streets, a full assessment should be charged when the improvement gets made to the residential street. This adglress fronts on a County Road and a residential street. A letter received from the Johnston's stated they would be willing to pay 50% of the assessment, hc~wever, they do object to a full assessment. Motion by Co _ancilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to amend the assessment to ,~how that the Johnston's will be paying one-half the amount. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beyer, Beahen and Zimmerm~. Voting No: None. Motion by Cogncilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to close the public hearing4 [ Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beyer, Beahen and Zimmerm~n. Voting No: None. The public he _~a~ing closed at 7:31 p.m. Council Bus!iness Mayor Hardin ~alled the regular portion of the City Council meeting back to order at 7:31 p.m. Motion by Co/~neilmember Zimmerman and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to adopt Resolution g95.-09-228 adopting assessment for Improvement Project g95-09 (Bituminous overlay Sports!Haven and Carol Rose Acres Additions) Motion carried~ Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Zimmerman, Beyer, Beahen and Peterson. Noting No: None. Mr. Jankowsk~ alerted Council that the same situation as the Johnston's occurs for two more property Owners in g95-10 and also one in g95-05. Discussion enSUed and it was determined that thc City should pick up the difference in the assessments fr~m assessing certain properties 50%. Motion by Cpuncilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer that Improvement ~oject g95-05 assessment be amended so that the similar property as the Johnston s pa~ one-half the assessment. City Council/September 26, 1995 Page 11 of 22