My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
07/12/95
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Fire Board
>
Agendas
>
1995
>
07/12/95
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2025 4:12:01 PM
Creation date
9/29/2003 9:28:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Fire Board
Document Date
07/12/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE # <br /> <br /> REVIEW BY FIRE DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NEW INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT <br />By: Ryan R. Schroeder, City Administrator <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />When a new' commercial or industrial facility is proposed in Ramsey, the application for <br />site plan review is made to the Zoning Administrator. The site plan is reviewed by the <br />Planning Commission on the first Tuesday of the month for Council action generally on the <br />fourth Tuesday. If the request is not controversial and the development has severe time <br />constraints, We will attempt to get the application to the City Council on the second <br />Tuesday. <br /> <br />We currently request the site plan application in our office three weeks in advance of the <br />Planning Commission meeting. In many cases, this occurs but the application may be <br />deficient of one piece of information or another. <br /> <br />Upon receipi of the application, the Zoning Administrator brings it to the next staff <br />development .meeting. Invited to that meeting are: <br /> <br />City Administrator, City Engineer, Finance Officer, Economic Development <br />Coordinator, Zoning Administrator, Public Works Supervisor, <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor, Forester, Building Official and Fire Chief <br /> <br />This meeting is the opportunity for these staff persons to make recommendations on <br />correcting plan deficiencies or improving the plan in some manner. Because of schedule <br />conflicts, the!Fire Chief is not able to attend these meetings. As an alternate, the plans are <br />forwarded to the Chief who then makes his recommendations. <br /> <br />These recommendations are assumed to include issues such as fire lanes and access, and <br />advice dealing with suppression (such as stand pipe locations if deemed appropriate). <br /> <br />The question here is twofold. First, are there concern areas that should be addressed at this <br />stage of the ;development that should be specifically identified in every application? <br />Second, do you have any suggestions for the staff review process itself?. The current <br />process seems to be working fine but suggested improvements are certainly welcome. <br /> <br />Committee Action: <br /> <br />Based upon discussion. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />Fire Chief <br /> <br />FB: 07/12/95 <br />/jmt <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.