Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />REQUEST i FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF NORTHFORK OAKS <br /> ~ 2ND ADDITION; CASE OF NORTH FORK, INC. <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background:' <br /> <br />North Fork, InF. is requesting preliminary plat approval of another portion of the Northfork <br />P.U.D. located tin the northeast comer of the property. The plat is to be named Northfork Oaks <br />2nd Addition a~d consists of 73 acres proposed to be planed into 37 single family lots. <br /> <br />The following it~ems are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) <br />b) <br />c) <br /> <br />te location map <br /> oposed preliminary plat and grading plan <br /> ity Staff review letter dated December 28, 1994 <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />With the platting of Northfork Oaks 2nd Addition, the number of lots will be within the 292 overall <br />approved in the ~May, 1990 modifications to the P.U.D. All of the lots meet the one acre minimum <br />lot size. <br /> <br />The lots are proposed to receive public access from the extension of Royal Road from the south <br />and 162nd from~the west. There are two cul-de-sacs that will extend off of Royal Road that do not <br />exceed the 600 ~ot maximum length standard. <br /> <br />In accordance With the May 9, 1989 Northfork Park Dedication Agreement, there is no park <br />dedication due Oh this area of the PUD. <br /> <br />A pedestrian transportation link is requ. ired to connect the trails in Northfork with those in <br />Woodlawn Estates to the East. The City ~s requiring that the. developer rough grade this link in a <br />location that gen~erally follows the rear yards of lots 5 through 13 of Block 2. <br /> <br />A Grading Plan ;has been provided which is generally acceptable. An erosion control plan also <br />needs to be pro~ided and soils data should be superimposed on the preliminary plat. A Tree <br />Preservation and!Planting Plan also needs to be provided as an addendum to the grading plan. <br /> <br />It is estimated that Lots 16 through 21 of Block 2 abut Armstrong Kennels. In response to <br />concerns expressed by Charles Delaney, owner of Armstrong Kennels, the developers are <br />prepared to address this situation in the same manner that was used in Northfork Oaks Addition. <br />In summa.D,, ang, lots abutting Armstrong Kennels are restricted from any clear-cutting within 75 <br />feet of the common property line and all buyers are put on notice of the existence and related <br />activities at Armctrong Kennels. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />City Staff recom~mends prelimina.D, plat approval contingent upon compliance with City Staff <br />review letter dated December 28, 1994. <br /> <br /> Motion to: <br /> Recommend that Ci~, Council ~ant/deny prelimina~D, plat approval to Nordafork Oaks 2nd <br /> Addition Contingent upon the developer compliance with CiD, Staff Review Letter dated <br /> December 28, 1994. <br /> <br />Review Chec~disti Cin., En~neer <br />~ Parks &Utiiides Supe~'isor <br />PC: 1/3/95 <br /> <br /> <br />