Laserfiche WebLink
o <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />That by ~tate Statute, the Applicant's proposal is considered a multifamily use in a single <br />family district. <br /> <br />That the gUbject property is surrounded by R-1 Rural Residential or single family zoning. <br /> <br />That on/gJarch 7, 1995, the Planning Commission called the public hearing to order in an <br />attempt tc~ r~eive public input on the issue, when a positive City action in fact will result in <br />a spot rez{>nmg. <br /> <br />That to l~cate a multi-family use in a single family district is not permitted by the <br />Conditiorgd Use Permit process as this is a re-zoning issue. <br /> <br />That a multi-family use is not compatible in a single family residential zone. <br /> <br />That perrr[iffing a multi-family use in a single family residential zone is not consistent with <br />the intent ~nd purposes of thc City's Zoning Chapter. <br /> <br />That the (lity has not permitted other multi-family units in a single family residential zone <br />since 197~. <br /> <br />The motion for t~e adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> ', and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />and the following abstained: <br />and the following ~Vere absent: <br /> <br />whereupon said r~$olution was declared duly adopted by the Ramsey City Council this the. day <br />of ; 1995. <br /> <br />ATI'EST: <br /> <br />Chairman <br /> <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />