Laserfiche WebLink
THE ZONING REPORT ..Page E~ight <br /> <br /> "Berms have 5 ft minimum height, 2:1 maxi- <br />mum slope and 2 ft minimum crown width. <br /> "Minimum Plant Size: <br />Large tree: single stem 1-1/2 inches caliPer; <br />multi-stem' clump: 6 ft height; <br />Small tree: 4 ft.height; <br />Evergreen shrubs: I2 inches height. <br /> "The buffer~ard provisions of this Section <br />shall not apply to PUDs. <br /> "The provisions contained in the bufferyard <br />requirements shall not app.l.¥ to' those uses lo- <br />cated ~ithin 'the DM "Downtown Mall" and CD <br />"Downtown Commercial" zoning district." <br /> <br />[Greenville NC] <br /> <br />"Responsibility for 'Bufferyard <br /> "(1) When a use is first to develop on two <br />adjacent vacant pa.rcel.s; the first use shall <br />provide the buffer, specified by the Table of <br />Bufferyard Requirements for vacant' land.. <br /> "(2) The second use to develop shall at the <br />time it develops, provide all additional piant <br />material and/or land necessary to provide the <br />total bufferyard required between the two <br />uses~ as specified by the Table of Bufferyard <br />Requirements. <br /> <br />"... The requirements of a bufferyard may be <br />satisfied by any one of the options illustrated <br /> <br />[for the bufferyard]. The "plant unit multiplier" <br />is a factor by which the basic number of plant <br />materials required for a given bufferyard is <br />determined given a change in the width of that <br />yard... <br /> "Ail bufferyard areas shall be seeded with <br />lawn grass or suitable ground cover." <br />[Florence SC] <br /> <br />"All areas for screening and buffering shall <br />remain void of buildings, parking, signing, <br /> <br />lighting (except lighting of pathways) and utili- <br />ties (unless underground). <br /> "Area required for screening and buffering <br />may be used to satisfy landscape and open <br />space requirement.s, and be included in the den- <br />sity calculations of the site [ed. note: and be <br />included in lot area for calculating impervious <br />surface ratios, lot coverage and FAR]. <br /> <br /> "I~/alls, fences and berms shall be the re- <br />quirement of the higher intensity use. <br /> "All plant unit fractions are rounded up, and <br />existing vegetation [in the buffer area] may be <br />used to satisfy planting requirements." <br />[Washington Co, HiIIsboro OR] <br /> <br />"Expansion' of existing uses: Approved plans <br />and development existing prior to the effective <br />date of [the ordinance enacting the bufferyard <br />concept as a chapter in the zoning code] shall <br />comply with the regulations under which ap- <br />proval was given, and shall be subject to the <br />provisions of this chapter if proposed expansion <br />will exceed 25% of the gross floor or lot area <br />of the existing development. The area and type <br />of landscaping required shall be determined <br />relative to the entire area of the develop- <br />ment.'' [Pima Co, Tucson AZ] <br /> <br />IN THE NEXT FEW ISSUES . . . <br />. . . In two weeks~ on April 7th, you get Part <br />One of two parts on a major topic: how to <br />write special neighborhood zones. You get Part <br />Two on April 21st, two weeks later. <br /> Then, for May 19th, we discuss zoning regu- <br />lations for mixed uses. For June 23rd: getting <br />it straight--defining lot, parcel, tract, lot of <br />record and zone lot. <br /> For July: another two-issue major topi~: a <br />complete checklist for shoreline zoning and <br />subdivision regulations. For August, you get <br />our comprehensive cumulative index and list of <br />titles of ali past issues. <br /> <br />We make every effort to present accurate in- <br />formation and sound opinion in this report. <br />However, we do not guarantee results, accu- <br />racy, or assume liability for errors, omissions, <br />or for information you may act upon. This pub- <br />lication does not purport to be engaged in the <br />practice of law or give legal advice~ but is the <br />opinion of the editor and publisher solely as a <br />professional urban planner. <br /> <br />March 24, 1995 issue <br /> <br /> <br />