My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/05/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/05/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 4:29:14 PM
Creation date
10/1/2003 9:18:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/05/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I, <br /> I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br /> COUNTY OF ANOKA <br /> Public Services Division <br /> <br /> HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT <br /> 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 <br /> NW, <br /> (612) 754°3520 FAX (612) 754-3532 <br /> <br />JANE K. PEMBLE <br />Trsffic Engineer <br /> <br />November 20, [995 <br /> <br />Derrick J. Passe <br /> · i <br />Passe Engmeeq.ug, Inc. <br />9445 East Rive~ Road #203 <br />Minneapolis, MN. 55433 <br /> ; <br /> <br />RE: Sketch Plan <br /> Ramsey Boulevard Site <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Passe:r <br /> <br />We have revieWed the sketch plan for the Ramsey Boulevard site, to be located east of CR <br />56 (Ramsey Blv ~d..)'and north' of CR 116 (Industry Avenue NW) within the City of Ramsey, <br />and I offer the following comments: <br /> <br /> Existing Zlight-of-way depicted On the plat adjacent to CR 56 and CR 116 is <br /> acceptabl~ and should be adequate for future reconstruction purposes <br /> (60 feet 9~ R/W east of CR 56R/W centerline, 60 feet of R/W north of <br /> CR 116 ~/W centerline). For review purposes, I have labelled the three <br /> proposed iaccess points (beginning on CR 56 and moving counter clockwise) as <br /> "A", "B", a~d "C". It appears that Case V Sight Distance Requirements <br /> cannot bd met at the location proposed for access "A" due to a vertical curve <br /> to the north on CR 56. Consequently, it is recommended that access "A" be <br /> relocated ~o the north to a point where Case V Sight Distance Requirements <br /> can be m~,rt. Similarly, it appears that Case V Sight Distance Requirements <br /> cannot be ;met at the locatzon proposed for access "B" due to a vertical curve <br /> to the wes,~ on CR 116. It is recommended that access "B" be relocated <br /> approxim~ttely 290 feet west to the crest of the vertical curve on CR 116. <br /> Cleadn~'a~ud grading should then be accomplished to the extent that Case I <br /> Sight Dz~st~Lnce Requirements can be met as well. Finally, it appears that <br /> Case V Sijht Distance Requirements c~nnot be met at the location proposed for <br /> access "C" 'due to the horizontal curvature of CR 116. Consequently, it zs , <br /> also reco ,rrknended that access "C" be relocated to the west to a point where., <br /> Case V Si~iht Distance Requirements can be met. The City and the <br /> Developer; should ensure that all sight distance requirements are met foz" <br /> this develc~pment. All lots within this plat should be configured so that i <br /> they access the city streets only, as no residential accesses will be . <br /> permitted Onto the County Highways. Right-of-access along the remaining <br /> portions ot~ CR 116 and CR 56 should be dedicated to Anoka County. <br /> <br /> Calculations must be submitted along with a grading and erosion control plan <br /> that delineates the drainage areas for this development. The post-developed <br /> <br />Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.