My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/05/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/05/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 4:29:14 PM
Creation date
10/1/2003 9:18:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/05/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br /> PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 9 OF CITY CODE <br /> TO AMEND PLATTING PROCESS <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik and City Engineer Steve Jankowski <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Several months agO, the Planning Commission directed City Staff to draft amendments to the City <br />Code to specificallg require that the Park and Recreation Commission review sketch plans for plats <br />prior to the Planning Commission. In the process, Staff also proposed some miscellaneous <br />amendments to the l~latting section to more closely reflect the current procedure used in processing <br />subdivisions in Rarhsey. <br /> <br />The proposed amendments were forwarded to the Park and Recreation Commission and they <br />rejected the idea of ~equiring plats to be reviewed by their board prior to the Planning Commission. <br />In their opinion, th{ current code requirement for initial review by the Planning Commission is <br />beneficial to them s~ they know preferred road alignemnts prior to locating parks and trails. The <br />Park Commission also suggested some other minor language adjustments to this section of City <br />Code. <br /> <br />At the direction of the Planning Commission, the proposed amendments were then forwarded to <br />City Council for their review. Council agreed with the changes and directed that the amendments <br />be forwarded to the ~Planning Commission for a public hearing. <br /> <br />Notification: <br /> <br />The public hearing Was advertised in the Anoka Union. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) <br />b) <br /> <br />Edit e~opy of proposed amendments showing additions and deletions <br />Sample ordinance <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />City Staff recommeni:ls approval of the proposed code amendments. <br /> Commission Action: <br /> <br />Motion to: <br />Recommend !that City Council <br />(Subdivision), of City. Code. <br /> <br />Review <br />PC: <br /> <br />adopt 'Ordinance g05-.--, amending Section 9.50 <br /> <br />Checklist: City Attorney <br /> ' City Engineer <br /> Parks & Utilities Supervisor <br /> <br /> 12/5/95 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.