Laserfiche WebLink
Septic tank standards do allow for construction of a mound system over an existing drainfield, and this option was <br />evaluated for size and cost considerations. The mound system would need to be approximately 40' wide x 80 long x <br />5' high, and is estimated to cost $15,000 - $18,000. Additional items that would also need to be completed with this <br />approach include; the installation of fill material and grading to raise the grades at the rear of the property (to <br />reduce water flow outside of the City easement in the future), restoration work (turf establishment and irrigation <br />revisions), and the vacation of additional easement because the 40' dimension on the mound width would extend <br />approximately another 10 feet in the remaining 25 foot easement retained by the City. Due to the need for <br />additional easement vacation, and placing the new drainfield within the area adjacent to this further reduced <br />easement, staff is not supportive of this option. <br />Option 3 <br />Staff evaluated the option for connected the property to the City's municipal sanitary sewer system; which includes <br />directional drilling of a force main to the existing septic tank on the property, pipe materials, restoration, a pump <br />and vault at the septic tank to lift the discharge to the city system (due to grade constraints), road work (bituminous <br />removal and patching), and connecting to an existing manhole. This item is currently be estimated, and additional <br />information will be provided at the meeting. The property owner is also concerned with the service charge for this <br />connection (currently $67 per month). <br />Recommendation: <br />It appears as if the best option at this point is to consider connecting this property to the City's municipal sanitary <br />sewer system. Once better estimates are prepared we can discuss further at the meeting. In an effort to expedite <br />this matter staff has placed a case on the regular Council agenda for later this evening and would like to receive <br />formal authorization to advance a resolution to this situation at that meeting. Ultimately it would probably make <br />the most sense to have the property owner contract directly for this work so they can actively manage the contractor <br />of their choice. <br />Funding Source: <br />The funding source for these potential improvements would most likely be the City Stormwater Utility Fund. <br />Council Action: <br />Based upon discussion. <br />Easement Vacation Resolution <br />Overview Map <br />Lot Sketch <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Brian Olson Brian Olson 08/04/2011 02:24 PM <br />Kurt Ulrich Amy Dietl 08/04/2011 02:31 PM <br />Form Started By: Tim Himmer Started On: 08/04/2011 11:07 AM <br />Final Approval Date: 08/04/2011 <br />