Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Councilmember Bawden introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #88-193 <br />WHEREAS, Glen and Brock Hammerschmidt are the fee owners of Lots 3 and 4, Block <br />3, Woodland Green; and <br />WHEREAS, the City has an easement for drainage purposes over the South 75 feet of <br />said Lot 4 and the, South 75 feet of the East 22 feet of said Lot 3; and <br />WHEP.EJS, Mr. Brock Hammerschmidt is proposing to build a house on said Lot 4 <br />which abuttc; the north line of the 75 feet wide drainage easement; and <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Brock Hammerschmidt has requested the City to vacate the north 50 <br />feet of its drainage: easement on said Lot 4 to allow for sloping the fill to the proposed elevation of <br />the house; and <br />WHEN ERAS, Mr. Glen Hammerschmidt has requested the City to vacate the North 50 feet <br />of its drainage easement on Lot 3 to provide a consistent drainage easement on each lot; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the request to vacate the North 50 feet of the <br />easement and find.; that the vacation will not affect the drainage in the area. <br />NOW TI1101h,F,)RE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF RAMSEY, NOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1) Thai flu C ty hereby vacates the North 50 feet of drainage easements over Lots 3 and 4, <br />Block :3, Woodland Green. <br />2) That the C ;i ty shall retain the South 25 feet of the drainage easements over and across Lots 3 <br />and 4, Flock_ 3, Woodland Green. <br />3) That Glen and Brock Hammerschmidt reimburse the City for all expenses involved in the <br />vacation of the drainage easements. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />DeLuca and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />Mayo]. kenzann <br />Conn e.ihues nbcr Bawden <br />Council] umber DeLuca <br />Counc i line; nbcr Pearson <br />Coeinc ii nee nbcr Sorteberg <br />and the folioxinf, voted against the same: <br />None <br />and the fol low in, abstained: <br />Nona. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />