Laserfiche WebLink
Review File: Stoney River <br />Sketch Plan and Site Plan Review <br />June 30, 2011, Revised August 17, 2011 <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />scale than the B-2 Highway Business District. Medical Clinics are a permitted use in this district, <br />although City Code does not specifically provide for assisted living or memory care facilities, which <br />include a residential component. The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council <br />approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Commercial to High Density Residential (HDR) and <br />subsequently a Zoning Amendment from B-1 General Business to R-3 Residential. <br />Building Height: The R-3 Residential District requires a maximum building height of 45 feet (as <br />measured to mean gable height) for multifamily buildings within this district. The proposed building <br />appears to have two stories with a gable/pitched roof. It is assumed that the building height is less than 45 <br />feet; however, the developer should provide scaled renderings with the Building Permit to verify actual <br />building height. <br />Maximum Structure Area. The R-3 District requires a maximum structure area of 35% of the lot area. <br />The proposed structure appears to cover approximately 18% of the lot area. <br />Setbacks: The R-3 Residential District requires setbacks as provided below. <br />Proposed <br />Required <br />Front <br />75 feet <br />25 feet <br />Exterior Development Boundary Line (EDBL) <br />130 feet <br />30 feet <br />Parking Node-EDBL <br />35 feet <br />35 feet <br />Parking/Maneuvering (ROW) <br />20 feet <br />20 feet <br />Parking/Maneuvering (EDBL) <br />15 feet <br />30 feet <br />It appears that a majority of the required setbacks are met with the proposed site plan. However, the <br />required setback for parking and maneuvering areas along the exterior development boundary line <br />appears to be deficient. However, given the spacing to the existing structure to the north of Lot 2 as well <br />as the preferred future land use and future development for the site, Staff recommends that the intent of <br />this ordinance provision is met. Given the tight spacing in the rear of the proposed lot, Staff encourages <br />amending the rear property line to increase the size of the proposed lot, thus increasing the amount of <br />green space provided to the proposed assisted living/memory care facility. This could be done for all, or a <br />small portion of the rear property line. <br />Exterior Materials. All exterior wall finishes on the proposed building shall be subject to the provisions <br />of City Code Section 117-113. The City may approve other materials and combinations of materials are <br />encouraged. It appears that there is a mixture of shakes, stone, and glass with various accents proposed. <br />Waste Storage: The waste storage area is proposed to be contained within the proposed building. <br />Off -Street Parking - Spaces Required: Given the quasi -residential, quasi -commercial nature of the <br />proposed use, Staff has applied a combination of commercial and medical use parking standards, rather <br />than typical residential parking minimums. The off-street parking ordinance sets a minimum parking <br />space standard of one (1) space per four (4) hospital beds plus an additional space for each employee. <br />The site plan proposed 66 off-street parking spaces with space for an additional 28 spaces. It appears that <br />there is ample parking for this type of use. Please provide the City with the number of employees for <br />final verification of parking requirements. <br />